首页> 外文会议>IISL Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space;International Astronautical Congress >Harmonisation of liability litigation- Lessons to be learnt from the Warsaw Convention
【24h】

Harmonisation of liability litigation- Lessons to be learnt from the Warsaw Convention

机译:协调责任诉讼 - 从华沙公约中学到的课程

获取原文

摘要

Under the Liability Convention, Member States are subject to unlimited joint and several liability for damage caused on terrestrial Earth by a space object if a State can be tied to an incident as a "launching state". Upon such a link being established, the Liability Convention then provides two methods of making a damage claim. Firstly, an inter-state diplomatic arrangement and secondly, that of a claim through the national court system. Under the latter, the issue of forum shopping inevitably arises as injured parties attempt to seek out the best jurisdiction in which a claim can be brought. This adds to both the cost and complexity of submitting a claim and is ill-suited in dealing with multi-state and multi-party claims arising from a single incident. With the soon-to-be realized implementation of mega-constellations, a flood of multi-state and-party claims will likely be the norm. For instance, because one or more satellite(s) from the same constellation disintegrates on their return journey to earth and showers an area with debris, causing a mixture of damage to individuals from different States. To address this issue, this paper advocates for an independent international substantive tort regime for space affairs to be applied by national courts akin to that of the Warsaw Convention and the Montreal Convention for air carriage incidents and provides recommendations on the transposability of these Conventions. Firstly, it looks at the Travaux Preparatoires of the two Conventions and the Liability Convention to determine common areas of intention that justify such a transposition. Secondly, it focuses on the substantive clauses of these Conventions that meet this common intention and makes recommendations on required modifications. Thirdly, the paper argues that to improve procedural expediency, an arrangement to allow for class action suits should be included and that claimants from different countries should be allowed to join such litigation. Finally, the pap
机译:根据“责任公约”,会员国须遵守无限的联合,如果国家可以与“发射状态”联系在一起,则通过空间对象对地球对地球造成的损坏的几个责任。在建立这样的联系时,责任公约随后提供了两种造成损害的方法。首先,国家间外交安排第二,通过国家法院制度索赔。在后者下,论坛购物问题不可避免地出现为受伤的缔约方试图寻求能够提出索赔的最佳管辖权。这增加了提交索赔的成本和复杂性,并对单一事件产生的多州和多方索赔进行了不适当的。随着Mega星座的即将实施,多州的多州索赔可能是常态。例如,因为来自同一星座的一个或多个卫星在其返回地球的返回之旅中崩解并淋浴碎片的区域,导致来自不同状态的个体的损害的混合物。为了解决这个问题,本文向国家法院倡导了一个独立的国际实质性侵权制度,这些法院就是国家法院适用于“华沙公约”和“蒙特利尔航空运输公约”,并向这些公约的转让性提出了建议。首先,它看着这两个公约的TravaUX准备和责任公约,确定了证明这种转让的公共意图领域。其次,它侧重于这些公约的实质性条款,符合这种共同意愿,并提出关于所需修改的建议。第三,本文认为,为了改善程序权宜之计,应包括允许课程诉讼的安排,并应允许来自不同国家的索赔人加入此类诉讼。最后,pap

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号