首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Education Technology and Economic Management >Lexical Aspect and L1 Transfer in the Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology
【24h】

Lexical Aspect and L1 Transfer in the Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology

机译:词汇方面和L1在收购时态的形态学中转移

获取原文

摘要

This study aims to investigate the acquisition of English verb morphology by learners of two typologically different L1s and the role of L1 transfer in the acquisition pattern, a cross-sectional study (n = 180) carried with Chinese and Mongolian college students learning English at two proficiency levels, using the cloze passage and composition. 120 cloze passages and 20 compositions were selected as data to be analyzed. Consistent with the Aspect Hypothesis, the results of MANOVA tests show a significant effect of lexical aspect on tense-aspect marking use: the perfective and past markings are strongly associated with Achievements/Accomplishments; the progressive marking is strongly associated with Activities; the present marking is strongly associated with States. Even though Mongolian and Chinese learners show virtually the same acquisition pattern, their performances in using the past, perfective, and progressive markings are different. Mongolian learners exhibiting superiority over Chinese learners in associating and correctly using the perfective and progressive markings, overuse of progressive markings by Mongolian learners, and overextending progressive markings to States by both L1 groups evidence L1 transfer. Contradictory findings–greater use and correct use of past markings with States than with Activities, overextending progressive markings to States, and learners' preference for using progressive markings with Achievements to Accomplishments suggest that the methodology, L1, sentence structures and input may somewhat affect the results of tense-aspect marking studies.
机译:本研究旨在调查两种类型不同L1S的学习者的英语动词形态的收购,以及L1转移在收购模式中的作用,用中蒙大学生在两个中学习英语的横断面研究(n = 180)熟练程度,使用渗透通道和组成。将120个渗透通道和20种组合物选择为要分析的数据。与方面假设一致,Manova测试的结果表明词汇方面对时态方面的显着影响:完美和过去的标记与成就/成就强烈有关;渐进标记与活动密切相关;目前标记与各国密切相关。尽管蒙古和中国学习者实际上表现出了几乎相同的收购模式,但它们在使用过去,完善和渐进标记时的表现也不同。蒙古学员在使用完美和渐进的标记中,展示中国学习者的优越性,利用蒙古学习者过度使用渐进标记,并通过L1组证据L1转移来过滤逐步标记。矛盾的结果 - 更大的使用和正确使用与国家的过去的标记,过度扩展逐行标记与各国,以及学习者对使用渐进标记的偏好,以实现成就的实现表明,方法,L1,句子结构和输入可能有点影响时态方面标记研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号