首页> 外文会议>Annual^Meeting of the National^Mastitis^Council >Effect of the Selective Treatment of Gram-positive Clinical MastitisCases versus Blanket Therapy
【24h】

Effect of the Selective Treatment of Gram-positive Clinical MastitisCases versus Blanket Therapy

机译:革兰氏阳性临床乳房酶与毯子治疗的选择性治疗

获取原文

摘要

Lago et al. (2011a and 2011b) reported that treating only clinical mastitis (CM) from which gram-positive bacteria were isolated resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic use with no significant differences in short- and long-term outcomes. However, one potential limitation of the study was that the label of the intramammary (IMM) antibiotic administered did not include efficacy claims against gram-negative bacteria. Intramammary antibiotic preparations, one containing ceftiofur and the otherhetacillin potassium, are currently approved in the United States with a label that claims efficacy against CM in lactating dairy cattle associated with E. coli. This manuscript's objective is to compare antibiotic use, clinical and bacteriological outcomes for selective treatment of only gram-positive clinical cases versus blanket therapy.
机译:Lago等人。 (2011年和2011年)报道,仅治疗患有革兰氏阳性细菌的临床乳腺炎(cm)导致抗生素使用的显着降低,并且在短期和长期结果中没有显着差异。然而,研究的一个潜在限制是胎儿胎儿(IMM)抗生素的标签不包括针对革兰氏阴性细菌的功效索赔。含有头孢噻呋和其他含有头孢虫素钾的内胎抗生素制剂目前在美国批准,标签索赔与大肠杆菌相关的哺乳酸乳牛中的疗效。该手稿的目的是比较抗生素使用,临床和细菌结果,以便选择性治疗只有革兰氏阳性临床病例与毯子治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号