首页> 外文会议>ASME Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition >COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTALLY AND NUMERICALLY DETERMINED DYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC SLIDE BEARINGS OPERATING IN THE NONLINEAR ROTATING SYSTEM
【24h】

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTALLY AND NUMERICALLY DETERMINED DYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC SLIDE BEARINGS OPERATING IN THE NONLINEAR ROTATING SYSTEM

机译:非线性旋转系统中操作的实验和数值确定动态系数的比较

获取原文

摘要

The article presents the calculation results of dynamic coefficients of hydrodynamic slide bearings obtained using three different methods. The numerical analysis based on a linear and nonlinear algorithm was carried out. The software developed at the Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery PAN was applied for this purpose. In the experimental research, we used the impulse response method for the determination of dynamic coefficients of hydrodynamic bearings. This method is based on a linear algorithm and allows the calculation of stiffness, damping and mass coefficients for the rotor - bearings system. It allows calculating the complete set of coefficients in only one calculation step. During experimental research, vibrations of the rotor supported on two slide bearings are excited using an impact hammer at the middle part of the shaft. Stiffness, damping and mass coefficients are determined after the analysis of displacements of the journals and the registered excitation forces. The shaft mass is known, therefore mass coefficients can be used for quick verification of the obtained results - by comparing their values with the shaft mass. The experimental tests were carried out on the test rig produced by SpectraQuest. The basic dynamic characteristics of the test rig were determined in the framework of this research, including vibration trajectories of the journals for both bearings - at rotational speeds between 2250 and 6000 rpm. In this speed range, a resonant speed of the rotor was noticed. The vibration trajectories of the journals were used to verify calculated coefficients of the hydrodynamic slide bearings. Since the tested system exhibits nonlinear properties, the three different calculation methods produced large differences in results. The numerical calculations conducted with a linear algorithm provide only one set of stiffness and damping coefficients for each rotational speed (two main and two cross-coupling coefficients for each bearing). In the case of calculations utilizing nonlinear algorithm, the values of coefficients vary over time, notwithstanding the fact that the rotational speed is a fixed value. In each time step, we have different values of stiffness and damping coefficients of the hydrodynamic bearings. In the case of calculations based on the results obtained from experimental research, we receive one set of coefficients for each rotational speed, just as it is for the linear algorithm. The mean and standard deviation of stiffness, damping and mass coefficients are obtained by repeating many times experimental tests followed by statistical calculations. To get values of the coefficients for more than one rotational speed, calculations must be made for each one separately. As a matter of fact, most mechanical systems exhibit certain nonlinear properties. In rotating machinery, we sometimes face distortions of their operation caused by, for example, couplings or supporting structures. In the ideal case, if the system had linear properties and operated correctly without any distortion, the results obtained from all three methods would be the same. The reality is that the experimentally and numerically determined coefficients of the hydrodynamic journal bearings differed, and their differences were discussed in this article. These differences arise from the adopted assumptions and abilities of the three different calculation models. In numerical calculations based on a linear algorithm, it is assumed that the bearing journal is in static equilibrium during its operation. For nonlinear calculations, the solution is found by iterations. The stiffness and damping coefficients are determined for sufficiently small time steps such that we can replace their values in every position of the bearing journal. In experimental research, it is essential that the bearing operation should be considered as the operation in the linear range.
机译:本文介绍了使用三种不同方法获得的流体动力滑动轴承的动态系数的计算结果。进行了基于线性和非线性算法的数值分析。在流体流动机械锅研究所开发的软件应用于此目的。在实验研究中,我们利用脉冲响应法测定流体动力轴承的动态系数。该方法基于线性算法,允许计算转子轴承系统的刚度,阻尼和质量系数。它允许仅在一个计算步骤中计算完整的系数集。在实验研究期间,在两个滑动轴承上支撑在两个滑动轴承的转子的振动在轴的中间部分处使用冲击锤进行激发。在分析期刊和注册激发力的分析之后确定刚度,阻尼和质量系数。织物是已知的,因此通过将它们的值与轴质量进行比较,可以使用块状系数来快速验证所获得的结果。实验测试在光谱产生的试验台上进行。测试钻机的基本动态特性在本研究的框架中确定,包括两个轴承的轴颈的振动轨迹 - 在2250和6000 rpm之间的转速。在这种速度范围内,注意到转子的谐振速度。期刊的振动轨迹用于验证流体动力滑动轴承的计算系数。由于测试系统表现出非线性性质,因此三种不同的计算方法产生了大的结果差异。用线性算法进行的数值计算仅为每个转速(每个轴承的两个主要和两个交叉耦合系数)提供一组刚度和阻尼系数。在利用非线性算法的计算的情况下,虽然旋转速度是固定值的事实,系数的值随时间而变化。在每个时间步骤中,我们具有不同的流体动力学轴承的刚度和阻尼系数的不同值。在基于从实验研究获得的结果的计算的情况下,我们为每个转速接收一组系数,就像线性算法一样。通过重复许多次的实验试验之后,通过重复统计计算来获得刚度​​,阻尼和质量系数的平均值和标准偏差。为了获得多于一种转速的系数的值,必须单独为每个旋转速度进行计算。事实上,大多数机械系统表现出某些非线性性质。在旋转机械中,我们有时会面临由例如联轴器或支撑结构引起的操作的扭曲。在理想情况下,如果系统具有线性特性并在没有任何失真的情况下正确操作,则从所有三种方法获得的结果是相同的。现实是,实验和数值确定的流体动力轴颈轴承系数不同,并且在本文中讨论了它们的差异。这些差异来自三种不同计算模型的采用假设和能力。在基于线性算法的数值计算中,假设轴承期在其操作期间处于静态平衡状态。对于非线性计算,通过迭代找到解决方案。确定刚度和阻尼系数对于足够小的时间步长,使得我们可以在轴承期刊的每个位置替换它们的值。在实验研究中,必须将轴承操作视为线性范围的操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号