首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition >COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTALLY AND NUMERICALLY DETERMINED DYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC SLIDE BEARINGS OPERATING IN THE NONLINEAR ROTATING SYSTEM
【24h】

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTALLY AND NUMERICALLY DETERMINED DYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS OF THE HYDRODYNAMIC SLIDE BEARINGS OPERATING IN THE NONLINEAR ROTATING SYSTEM

机译:非线性旋转系统中水力滑移轴承的实验和数值确定的动力系数比较

获取原文

摘要

The article presents the calculation results of dynamic coefficients of hydrodynamic slide bearings obtained using three different methods. The numerical analysis based on a linear and nonlinear algorithm was carried out. The software developed at the Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery PAN was applied for this purpose. In the experimental research, we used the impulse response method for the determination of dynamic coefficients of hydrodynamic bearings. This method is based on a linear algorithm and allows the calculation of stiffness, damping and mass coefficients for the rotor - bearings system. It allows calculating the complete set of coefficients in only one calculation step. During experimental research, vibrations of the rotor supported on two slide bearings are excited using an impact hammer at the middle part of the shaft. Stiffness, damping and mass coefficients are determined after the analysis of displacements of the journals and the registered excitation forces. The shaft mass is known, therefore mass coefficients can be used for quick verification of the obtained results - by comparing their values with the shaft mass. The experimental tests were carried out on the test rig produced by SpectraQuest. The basic dynamic characteristics of the test rig were determined in the framework of this research, including vibration trajectories of the journals for both bearings - at rotational speeds between 2250 and 6000 rpm. In this speed range, a resonant speed of the rotor was noticed. The vibration trajectories of the journals were used to verify calculated coefficients of the hydrodynamic slide bearings. Since the tested system exhibits nonlinear properties, the three different calculation methods produced large differences in results. The numerical calculations conducted with a linear algorithm provide only one set of stiffness and damping coefficients for each rotational speed (two main and two cross-coupling coefficients for each bearing). In the case of calculations utilizing nonlinear algorithm, the values of coefficients vary over time, notwithstanding the fact that the rotational speed is a fixed value. In each time step, we have different values of stiffness and damping coefficients of the hydrodynamic bearings. In the case of calculations based on the results obtained from experimental research, we receive one set of coefficients for each rotational speed, just as it is for the linear algorithm. The mean and standard deviation of stiffness, damping and mass coefficients are obtained by repeating many times experimental tests followed by statistical calculations. To get values of the coefficients for more than one rotational speed, calculations must be made for each one separately. As a matter of fact, most mechanical systems exhibit certain nonlinear properties. In rotating machinery, we sometimes face distortions of their operation caused by, for example, couplings or supporting structures. In the ideal case, if the system had linear properties and operated correctly without any distortion, the results obtained from all three methods would be the same. The reality is that the experimentally and numerically determined coefficients of the hydrodynamic journal bearings differed, and their differences were discussed in this article. These differences arise from the adopted assumptions and abilities of the three different calculation models. In numerical calculations based on a linear algorithm, it is assumed that the bearing journal is in static equilibrium during its operation. For nonlinear calculations, the solution is found by iterations. The stiffness and damping coefficients are determined for sufficiently small time steps such that we can replace their values in every position of the bearing journal. In experimental research, it is essential that the bearing operation should be considered as the operation in the linear range.
机译:本文介绍了使用三种不同方法获得的流体动力滑动轴承动力系数的计算结果。进行了基于线性和非线性算法的数值分析。为此,使用了由PAN流体机械研究所开发的软件。在实验研究中,我们使用脉冲响应法来确定流体动力轴承的动力系数。该方法基于线性算法,可以计算转子-轴承系统的刚度,阻尼和质量系数。它仅需一个计算步骤即可计算出完整的系数集。在实验研究过程中,通过在轴中间部分使用冲击锤来激发两个滑动轴承上支撑的转子的振动。刚度,阻尼和质量系数是在分析轴颈的位移和所记录的激振力之后确定的。轴质量是已知的,因此质量系数可用于将结果与轴质量进行比较,从而快速验证所获得的结果。实验测试是在SpectraQuest生产的测试台上进行的。试验台架的基本动态特性是在此研究框架内确定的,包括两个轴承轴颈的振动轨迹-转速在2250至6000 rpm之间。在该速度范围内,注意到转子的共振速度。轴颈的振动轨迹用于验证流体动力滑动轴承的计算系数。由于被测系统具有非线性特性,因此三种不同的计算方法在结果上存在很大差异。用线性算法进行的数值计算对于每个转速仅提供一组刚度和阻尼系数(每个轴承两个主要和两个交叉耦合系数)。在使用非线性算法进行计算的情况下,尽管转速是固定值,但系数的值会随时间变化。在每个时间步中,流体动力轴承的刚度和阻尼系数都有不同的值。在根据实验研究的结果进行计算的情况下,对于每一种转速,我们都会收到一组系数,就像线性算法一样。刚度,阻尼和质量系数的平均值和标准偏差是通过重复多次实验测试,然后进行统计计算得出的。为了获得一个以上转速的系数值,必须分别为每个转速进行计算。实际上,大多数机械系统都表现出某些非线性特性。在旋转机械中,有时我们会遇到由于例如联轴器或支撑结构而导致其运行失真的问题。在理想情况下,如果系统具有线性特性并且可以正确运行且没有任何失真,则从这三种方法获得的结果都是相同的。实际情况是,流体动力学轴颈轴承的实验和数值确定系数不同,因此本文讨论了它们的差异。这些差异源自三种不同计算模型的采用假设和能力。在基于线性算法的数值计算中,假设轴承轴颈在其运行期间处于静态平衡。对于非线性计算,可通过迭代找到解决方案。刚度和阻尼系数是在足够小的时间步长内确定的,这样我们就可以在轴承轴颈的每个位置上替换它们的值。在实验研究中,必须将轴承操作视为线性范围内的操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号