首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference >Professional Engineering Licensure and Professional Experience among Civil Engineering Faculty: A Multi-Institutional Comparison
【24h】

Professional Engineering Licensure and Professional Experience among Civil Engineering Faculty: A Multi-Institutional Comparison

机译:专业的工程执照和土木工程学院的专业经验:多机构比较

获取原文

摘要

Civil engineering faculty members endeavor to prepare their students for a variety of career paths within the engineering industry. Several of those paths require or are bolstered when students decide to pursue licensure to practice as professional engineers. As students, individuals learn about the merits of professional licensure from a variety of sources. Not to be overlooked is the influence that professors, licensed as professional engineers, have on their students and the opportunity to act as a role model to those students considering a career path that includes professional licensure. The research question explored during this study was; "Among currently licensed civil engineering faculty members, what are the perceived values of professional experience and of licensure as a professional engineer?" A reality testing, qualitative-based framework was utilized to design and execute a study in response to the research question. Within this study, the authors evaluated the existing literature, both internal and external to civil engineering, relative to prior studies of experience and professional licensure among engineering faculty. Further, the authors conducted a series of interviews with licensed faculty members at three disparate universities, using a semi-structured interview protocol. As the authors represent three distinctly unique academic institutions, the collected interview data were evaluated for commonality, as well as differentiation among the academic institutions. The interview process probed at issues including the perceived value of licensure among faculty members, the relationship between licensure and promotion/tenure, and the licensed faculty member as a role model for colleagues and future engineers. This paper details the research design, implementation of the study, and the resulting findings. The findings and conclusions of this study will be of interest to a variety of academic and licensure stake-holders, including: civil engineering faculty members (both licensed and unlicensed), academic administrators, and licensing organizations such as the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES).
机译:土木工程学院成员努力为工程行业内的各种职业道路做好准备。当学生决定追求专业工程师的许可时,这些路径中的几条路径需要或加强。作为学生,个人了解各种来源的专业许可证的优点。不要被忽视是教授,作为专业工程师的教授,对学生的影响以及考虑到包括专业许可的职业道路的职业道路的机会。这项研究中探讨的研究问题是; “在目前许可的土木工程学院成员中,专业经验和许可证作为专业工程师的知识值是什么?”现实测试,基于定性的框架用于设计和执行响应研究问题的研究。在本研究中,作者在工程学院之间的经验和专业许可的前提研究中,评估了土木工程内部和外部的现有文献。此外,作者使用半结构化访谈协议在三所不同大学中与许可的教师成员进行了一系列访谈。由于作者代表了三个明显独特的学术机构,因此评估了采访数据的共同性,以及学术机构之间的差异化。采访过程探讨了在包括教师成员之间的执照,许可与促进/任期之间的关系,以及许可的教师作为同事和未来工程师的榜样。本文详述了研究设计,实施的研究和所产生的结果。本研究的调查结果和结论将对各种学术和许可证持有人感兴趣,包括:土木工程学院成员(许可和未许可),学术管理者和国家审查员委员会工程委员会等许可组织和测量(NCEES)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号