首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(949) THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIORS’ EDUCATION FOR THE LEVEL OF THEIR COGNITIVE COMPETENCIES
【24h】

(949) THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIORS’ EDUCATION FOR THE LEVEL OF THEIR COGNITIVE COMPETENCIES

机译:(949)老年人教育对其认知能力水平的重要性

获取原文

摘要

Cognitive competencies of adults are described by different theoretical models, most often in empirical research using the information processing model and the genetic-development model. In the first case, individual processes, such as the speed and accuracy of information processing, are tested. The second model tests the ability to solve abstract, laboratory and practical problems. From middle adulthood, competencies in abstract thinking are reduced, but training limits this decline (Salthouse, 1993, 2006; Sternberg, 1996, Birren, Schaie 2006; Michalska 2015). The ability to solve practical problems is stable and even increases with age of adults (Blanchard-Fields, 2007; Gurba 2016), but it is not known whether education is important for these seniors competencies. The purpose of the study was to determine if the level of cognitive competencies of seniors, measured by the way of solving everyday problems (Test Everyday Problem by Sebby, Papini, 1994), depends on their participation in education in the course of the Third Age University. The two groups of seniors: students of the Third Age University (45 persons) and those who did not participate in institutional education (50 persons) were examined. The best solutions presented by the respondents were compared. For the analysis of the level of cognitive competence, the concept of G. Labouvie-Vief (1980) was used.
机译:不同的理论模型描述了成年人的认知能力,最常见于使用信息处理模型和遗传开发模型的实证研究。在第一种情况下,测试了各个过程,例如信息处理的速度和准确性。第二种模型测试了解决摘要,实验室和实际问题的能力。从成年中间,抽象思想的能力减少,但培训限制了这种下降(Salthouse,1993,2006; Sternberg,1996,Birren,Schaie 2006; Michalska 2015)。解决实际问题的能力稳定,甚至随着成人年龄的增长(Blanchard-Fields,2007; Gurbb 2016),但尚不清楚教育对这些老年人的能力很重要。该研究的目的是通过解决日常问题的方式来确定老年人的认知能力水平(Sebby,Papini,1994年测试日常问题)取决于他们在第三次的过程中参与教育大学。两组老年人:第三次大学(45人)和那些没有参加体制教育(50人)的学生。比较受访者提供的最佳解决方案。为了分析认知能力水平,使用了G. labouvie-vief(1980)的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号