首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Comparison of Quantitative Determination Techniques with Electronic Tongue Measurements
【24h】

Comparison of Quantitative Determination Techniques with Electronic Tongue Measurements

机译:电子舌测量定量测定技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

The objective of the paper reported here was to compare different quantitative techniques for the determination of the adjusted R squares and root mean squared errors of prediction for the different prediction types. The concentration of different solutions was predicted by different quantitative techniques. Linear relationship was found between the logarithm of concentration of different chemical solutions and the sensor response signals. The model of multiple linear regression with the selected sensors gave the highest adjusted R-squared and the lowest root mean squared error of prediction. The root mean squared error of prediction of instant coffee was better than that of mono-sodium glutamate. There was not definite difference between the adjusted R squares for the different prediction types (MLR, PLS and PCR). However, some difference was found between the root mean squared errors of prediction for the different algorithms. Consequently, the electronic tongue was found to be suitable for the analysis of model solutions (e.g. mono-sodium glutamate) and liquid foods (e.g. instant coffee) by the means of the used prediction types and algorithms.
机译:这里报道的纸张的目的是比较不同的定量技术来确定调整的R平方根和对不同预测类型的预测的均平均平方误差。通过不同的定量技术预测不同溶液的浓度。不同化学溶液浓度与传感器响应信号的对数之间的线性关系。与所选传感器的多个线性回归模型给出了最高调整的R线和预测的最低均线误差。速溶咖啡预测的根部平均平方误差优于单钠谷氨酸钠。不同预测类型的调整R方格之间没有明确的差异(MLR,PLS和PCR)。然而,在不同算法预测的根部平均平方误差之间发现了一些差异。因此,发现电子舌适用于通过使用的预测类型和算法的方式分析模型解决方案(例如单钠谷氨酸)和液体食品(例如即时咖啡)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号