首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement >Exploring Preference of Chronological and Relevancy Filtering in Effort Estimation
【24h】

Exploring Preference of Chronological and Relevancy Filtering in Effort Estimation

机译:探讨按时间顺序和相关性滤波的优先考虑

获取原文

摘要

BACKGROUND: Effort estimation models are often built based on history data from past projects in an organization. Filtering techniques have been proposed for improving the estimation accuracy. Chronological filtering relies on the time proximity among project data and ignores much old data. Relevancy filtering utilizes the proximity of characteristics among project data and ignores dissimilar data. Their interaction is interesting because one would be able to make more accurate estimates if a positive synergistic effect exists. AIMS: To examine whether the chronological filtering and the relevancy filtering can contribute to improving the estimation accuracy together. METHOD: moving windows approaches as chronological filtering and a nearest neighbor approach as relevancy filtering are applied to a single-company ISBSG data. RESULTS: we observed a negative synergistic effect. Each of the filtering approaches brought better effort estimates than using the whole history data. However, their combination may cause worse effort estimates than using the whole history data. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners should care about a negative synergistic effect when combining the chronological filtering and the relevancy filtering.
机译:背景:努力估算模型通常基于组织中过去项目的历史数据构建。已经提出过滤技术来提高估计精度。时间筛选依赖于项目数据之间的时间邻近,并忽略了大量旧数据。相关性过滤利用项目数据之间的特征接近,忽略不同数据。他们的互动是有趣的,因为如果存在积极的协同效应,人们将能够做出更准确的估计。目的:检查时间顺序过滤和相关性滤波是否有助于提高估计精度。方法:将Windows方法移动为时间顺序滤波和最近的邻近方法,作为相关性过滤应用于单一公司ISBSG数据。结果:我们观察到了负协同效应。每个过滤方法都带来了比使用整个历史数据更好的努力估算。然而,它们的组合可能导致较差的努力估算而不是使用整个历史数据。结论:在结合时间滤波和相关性滤波时,从业者应该关心负面协同效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号