首页> 外文会议>IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference >Philosophy and Engineering Education. A Review of Certain Developments in the Field
【24h】

Philosophy and Engineering Education. A Review of Certain Developments in the Field

机译:哲学与工程教育。对现场某些发展的综述

获取原文

摘要

In 2005 a review of engineering education publications in the area of philosophy and engineering showed that the majority were concerned with the role of and teaching of ethics. There were some in which the term philosophy was used to explain the rationale behind new programmes. One or two discussed the relevance of philosophy to engineering education, and Koen had just published his major discourse on method. Since then there has been a major thrust to develop a philosophy of engineering that is distinct from the philosophy of science. Much attention has focused on the differences between engineering, science and technology. This movement has had support from the lead professional academies in a number of countries (e.g. China, The Netherlands, the UK and the US). It has inspired seminars and a major international meeting in the Netherlands. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the more than 100 small and large published contributions during the last three years. No attempt is made to review all of them. The purpose is to give the flavour of the debate. It is clear that the mingling of engineering and philosophy raises profound issues and creates great challenges that obligate a response from the engineering community. Many of the publications have something to say about either the curriculum or instruction but they do not draw on the philosophy of education. There is a need for the two philosophies to come together to create a more informed critique of engineering education.
机译:2005年,哲学与工程领域的工程教育出版物综述表明,大多数人都关注道德的作用和教学。有些人在其中哲学被用来解释新计划背后的理由。一两个人讨论了哲学对工程教育的相关性,而Koen刚刚发表了他的主要话语。从那时起,发展哲学的工程哲学是一种与科学哲学不同。很多关注都集中在工程,科学和技术之间的差异。这种运动已经支持了许多国家的领导专业学院(例如中国,荷兰,英国和美国)。它有启发研讨会和荷兰的主要国际会议。本文的目的是在过去三年中审查一些超过100个小和大型公布的捐款。没有尝试审查所有这些。目的是给出辩论的味道。很明显,工程和哲学的混合引发了深刻的问题,并造成了巨大的挑战,这是从工程界的回应。许多出版物对课程或指示有些东西有些东西,但他们没有借鉴教育的哲学。需要两种哲学,共同聚集在一起创造一个更明智的工程教育批判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号