首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems >Personalizing Knowledge Tracing: Should We Individualize Slip, Guess, Prior or Learn Rate?
【24h】

Personalizing Knowledge Tracing: Should We Individualize Slip, Guess, Prior or Learn Rate?

机译:个性化知识追踪:我们是否适用于单独,猜测,之前或学习率?

获取原文

摘要

The intelligent tutoring system field is concerned with ways of personalizing to the student. Wang and Heffernan introduced the Student Skill model and showed that it was reliably better than the Knowledge Tracing (KT) model in predictive accuracies. One limitation of their work is that they only investigated one particular way of personalizing, which individualizes all four KT parameters simultaneously. But it may be better if we just use some of the parameters to personalize the model. More generally, we want to address the research question: What are the most important features to personalize? In this work, we systematically explored all 16 possible ways of incorporating student features into the model. We found that prior and slip are the two most important features to individualize, and the best model is the one with all four parameters individualized. Additionally, the one parameter that can be dropped without any hurt to performance is guess.
机译:智能辅导系统领域涉及对学生个性化的方式。王和Heffernan介绍了学生技能模式,并表明它比预测准确性的知识跟踪(KT)模型可靠地优于知识追踪(KT)模型。他们工作的一个限制是他们只研究了一个特定的个性化方式,它同时个性化所有四个KT参数。但如果我们只使用一些参数来个性化模型,可能会更好。更一般地说,我们想解决研究问题:个性化最重要的功能是什么?在这项工作中,我们系统地探索了将学生特征纳入模型的所有16种可能的方法。我们发现先前和滑动是个性化的两个最重要的特征,最好的模型是个性化的所有四个参数的功能。此外,可以猜测可以丢弃的一个参数,没有任何伤害性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号