首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Integrated Power Electronics Systems >Comparison of different technologies for the die attach of power semi-conductor devices conducting active power cycling
【24h】

Comparison of different technologies for the die attach of power semi-conductor devices conducting active power cycling

机译:电力半导体器件电源循环电力攻击的不同技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

The three different die attach technologies soldering, silver sintering and transient liquid phase bonding (TLPB) were compared conducting active power cycling tests. The active power cycling method used was designed such that the temperature swing of the semiconductor die was held constant over the whole testing time. The TLPB interconnects consisting of the intermetallic phases Cu_6Sn_5 and Cu_3Sn showed the highest life time followed by Ag sinter joints made applying a sintering pressure of 30 MPa showing almost the same life time. Even the pressure less sintered samples showed a much higher life time than the soldered interconnects made of SnAg3.5 solder. While the soldered samples failed due to solder fatigue, the silver sintered and TLPB samples showed failures like delaminations and cracks in the substrate rather than in the interconnects themselves.
机译:比较了三种不同的模具附着技术焊接,银烧结和瞬态液相键合(TLPB)进行了活性功率循环试验。设计了所使用的有功功率循环方法,使得半导体管芯的温度摆动在整个测试时间上保持恒定。由金属间相Cu_6sn_5和Cu_3Sn组成的TLPB互连显示出最高的寿命,其次是Ag烧结接头,其使30MPa的烧结压力显示出几乎相同的寿命。甚至压力较少的烧结样品也比由SnAG3.5焊料制成的焊接互连显示得更高的寿命。虽然焊接样品由于焊料疲劳而导致的,但是银烧结和TLPB样品显示出底物中的分层和裂缝的故障,而不是在互连本身中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号