首页> 外文会议>International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering >A Comparative Study of the Use of Media by Chinese and American Governments in Risk Communication — The Use of Social Media
【24h】

A Comparative Study of the Use of Media by Chinese and American Governments in Risk Communication — The Use of Social Media

机译:中美两国政府在风险交流中使用媒体的比较研究-社交媒体的使用

获取原文

摘要

[Purpose/Meaning] In the past 10 years, the modern media marked by the rise of new media has developed rapidly. The comprehensive application of digital media technology has almost been subversive in the field of risk communication. Social media has become an important channel for citizens to participate in risk communication. Although domestic and foreign studies have shown that social media is increasingly used in risk communication, few studies have compared the use of social media in risk communication between Chinese and American governments from the perspective of communication effects. [Methods/Processes] The content analysis method is used to explore the differences between different management organizations and different crisis stages in the risk communication between the two countries in terms of issue construction, public use behavior, and public and government social media interaction. [Results/Conclusions] The study found that China focused on building factual frameworks and the US focused on building action frameworks; the two countries have high public participation, but the two government social media lacks responses to public questions; the amount of information published by China far exceeds that of the United States, but China The public's positive comment rate is lower than the US and other issues. Finally, based on the comparative conclusions, the Chinese government provides effective advice on the effective use of government social media for risk communication.
机译:[目的/意义]在过去的十年中,以新媒体兴起为标志的现代媒体发展迅速。在风险传达领域,数字媒体技术的全面应用几乎是颠覆性的。社交媒体已成为公民参与风险交流的重要渠道。尽管国内外研究表明,社交媒体在风险交流中的使用越来越多,但很少有研究从传播效果的角度比较中美政府之间在风险交流中使用社交媒体的情况。 [方法/过程]内容分析方法用于探讨两国之间在问题构建,公共使用行为以及公共和政府社交媒体互动方面的风险沟通中不同管理组织和危机阶段之间的差异。 [结果/结论]研究发现,中国侧重于建立事实框架,而美国侧重于建立行动框架。两国公众参与度很高,但两国政府的社交媒体对公众问题缺乏回应。中国发布的信息量远远超过美国,但中国公众的正面评论率低于美国和其他问题。最后,基于比较结论,中国政府为有效利用政府社交媒体进行风险沟通提供了有效的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号