首页> 外文会议>Intelligent Tutoring Systems >Automatic Analyses of Cohesion and Coherence in Human Tutorial Dialogues During Hypermedia:A Comparison among Mental Model Jumpers
【24h】

Automatic Analyses of Cohesion and Coherence in Human Tutorial Dialogues During Hypermedia:A Comparison among Mental Model Jumpers

机译:超媒体期间人类教程对话中的衔接和连贯性自动分析:心智模型跳线之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We analyzed cohesion and coherence in tutorial dialogues from 66 think-aloud transcripts collected from a human tutorial dialogue study which investigated the effect of tutoring on middle and high school students' learning about the circulatory system with hypermedia [1]. Our findings showed that there were significant differences in the tutorial dialogues of Jumpers (i.e., those who showed significant pretest-posttest mental model shifts about the science topic) versus No-jumpers (i.e., those who showed no significant shifts) in the semantic/conceptual similarity, readability scores, incidence scores of causal verbs and causal connectives, and turn length. We argue that the semantic/conceptual similarity of the discourse, causal verbs/causal connectives, and longer turns primarily facilitated the improvement in Jumpers' mental models and deep learning.
机译:我们从一项来自人类的对话研究中收集的66份思维对话笔录中分析了对话中的衔接和连贯性,该笔成绩调查了辅导对中学生对超媒体循环系统学习的影响[1]。我们的发现表明,跳线(即那些在科学主题上表现出明显的前后测验思维模式转变的人)与无跳线(即,没有表现出明显变化的人)的教程对话存在显着差异。概念相似度,可读性得分,因果动词和因果连词的发生率得分以及转弯长度。我们认为,话语在语义/概念上的相似性,因果动词/因果联系词以及较长的转弯主要是促进了Jumpers思维模式和深度学习的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号