【24h】

The efficiency of reading around learned backgrounds

机译:围绕学习的背景进行阅读的效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most metrics of medical image quality typically treat all variability components of the background as a Gaussian noise process. This includes task based model observers (non-prewhitening matched filter without and with an eye filter, NPW and NPWE; Hotelling and Channelized Hotelling) as well as Fourier metrics of medical image quality based on the noise power spectra. However, many investigators have observed that unlike many of the models/metrics, physicians often can discount signal-looking structures that are part of the normal anatomic background. This process has been referred to as reading around the background or noise. The purpose of this paper is to develop an experimental framework to systematically study the ability of human observers to read around learned backgrounds and compare their ability to that of an optimal ideal observer which has knowledge of the background. We measured human localization performance of one of twelve targets in the presence of a fixed background consisting of randomly placed Gaussians with random contrasts and sizes, and white noise. Performance was compared to a condition in which the test images contained only white noise but with higher contrast. Human performance was compared to standard model observers that treat the background as a Gaussian noise process (NPW, NPWE and Hotelling), a Fourier-based prewhitening matched filter, and an ideal observer. The Hotelling, NPW, NPWE models as well as the Fourier-based prewhitening matched filter predicted higher performance for the white noise test images than the background plus white noise. In contrast, ideal and human performance was higher for the background plus white noise condition. Furthermore, human performance exceeded that of the NPW, NPWE and Hotelling models and reached an efficiency of 19 % relative to the ideal observer. Our results demonstrate that for some types of images human signal localization performance is consistent with use of knowledge about the high order moments of the backgrounds to discount signal-looking structures that belong to the background. In such scenarios model observers and metrics that either ignore the background or treat the background as a Gaussian process (Hotelling, Channelized Hotelling, Task-based SNR) under predict human performance.
机译:大多数医学图像质量指标通常将背景的所有可变性成分视为高斯噪声过程。这包括基于任务的模型观察器(不带和带有眼图滤光器的非预增白匹配滤光器,NPW和NPWE;霍特林和通道化霍林)以及基于噪声功率谱的医学图像质量的傅里叶度量。但是,许多研究人员已经观察到,与许多模型/指标不同,医师通常可以轻视属于正常解剖背景的看似信号的结构。该过程被称为在背景或噪声周围阅读。本文的目的是建立一个实验框架,系统地研究人类观察者阅读学习的背景的能力,并将其与具有背景知识的最佳理想观察者的能力进行比较。我们在固定背景下测量了十二个目标之一的人体定位性能,该背景包括随机放置的高斯图像,随机对比度和大小以及白噪声。将性能与测试图像仅包含白噪声但对比度更高的条件进行了比较。将人类表现与标准模型观察者进行了比较,标准模型观察者将背景视为高斯噪声过程(NPW,NPWE和Hotelling),基于傅立叶的预加白匹配滤波器以及理想的观察者。 Hotelling,NPW,NPWE模型以及基于傅立叶的预加白匹配滤波器预测白噪声测试图像的性能要高于背景加白噪声。相比之下,背景和白噪声条件下的理想和人类性能更高。此外,人类的表现超出了NPW,NPWE和Hotelling模型的表现,相对于理想的观察者,其效率达到了19%。我们的结果表明,对于某些类型的图像,人的信号定位性能与使用有关背景的高阶矩的知识相较于属于背景的看似信号的结构便宜。在这种情况下,模型观察者和度量标准会忽略背景或将背景视为预测人类绩效的高斯过程(Hotelling,Channelized Hotelling,基于任务的SNR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号