【24h】

Feature-Rich Ego-Network Circles in Mobile Phone Graphs: Tie Multiplexity and the Role of Alters

机译:手机图形中功能丰富的自我网络圈:领带的多重性和替代者的作用

获取原文

摘要

A well-known result in social science states that, although people maintain a large number of social relationships, in practice, their interactions are concentrated mostly on a small portion of their neighbors. According to Dunbar's hypothesis, this phenomenon is due to a limited human cognitive capacity to handle too many social relationships, together with a few time for socializing. These constraints result in an organization of people's ego-network into four or five groups depending on the strength of the interactions, the so called Dunbar's circles. The verification of the Dunbar's hypothesis, the identification of social circles and their characterization are still open questions, although researchers have found evidence of its validity on different social networks, from small offline networks to online social networks, such as Twitter and Facebook. In addition, little is known about the semantic aspects of the circles, i.e. who are the members of each circle. In this paper, we cope with these issues by analyzing a mobile phone graph where people's interactions are expressed by both voice calls and text messages. We firstly compare two methods for the identification of the circles, which rely on the different definitions of strength proposed in literature. Both methods confirm the subdivision of ego-networks into four or five circles, each characterized by a specific interaction strength. Then, we validate the Dunbar's hypothesis and, by leveraging some powerful features of the mobile phone dataset in use, we provide a first semantic characterization of social circles. We show, for instance, that people maintain relationships with the members of the closest circles by combining calls and texts. In addition, by detecting home and work locations of each individual, we highlight that a semantic aspect, such as the role of the alters, impacts on the ego-network circles. In particular, family members and workmates are located in different circles: the former mainly form the closest circle, i.e. the support clique, while the latter are distributed among the outer circles.
机译:社会科学的一个著名结果表明,尽管人们维持着大量的社会关系,但实际上,他们的互动主要集中在邻居的一小部分。根据邓巴(Dunbar)的假设,这种现象是由于人类处理太多社会关系的认知能力有限,以及需要很少的社交时间。这些限制导致人们的自我网络根据互动的强度分为四个或五个组,即所谓的邓巴圈子。尽管研究人员已经发现了Dunbar假说的验证,对社交圈的标识及其特征仍然是尚待解决的问题,但研究人员已经找到了其在各种社交网络(从小型离线网络到在线社交网络,例如Twitter和Facebook)上的有效性的证据。另外,对于圈子的语义方面(即谁是每个圈子的成员)知之甚少。在本文中,我们通过分析手机图表来解决这些问题,在手机图表中人们的互动既可以通过语音通话也可以通过短信来表达。我们首先比较两种识别圆的方法,这两种方法依赖于文献中提出的强度的不同定义。两种方法都将自我网络细分为四个或五个圆圈,每个圆圈都具有特定的交互强度。然后,我们验证Dunbar的假设,并利用所使用的手机数据集的某些强大功能,提供社交圈的第一个语义特征。例如,我们表明人们通过组合通话和短信来保持与最接近圈子成员的关系。另外,通过检测每个人的家庭和工作地点,我们强调了语义方面(例如变更的角色)会影响自我网络圈子。特别地,家庭成员和同事位于不同的圈子中:前者主要形成最近的圈子,即支持集团,而后者则分布在外围圈子中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号