首页> 外文会议>History of computing : Learning from the past >And They Were Thinking? Basic, Logo, Personality and Pedagogy
【24h】

And They Were Thinking? Basic, Logo, Personality and Pedagogy

机译:他们在想什么?基本,徽标,个性和教学法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper is concerned with some limited aspects of the history of two programming languages purpose-designed for students learning to program digital computers: Basic and Logo. The focus is the very different educational aims and philosophies of the originators of these languages. They are compared and their early use in schools sketched. While the reasons for teaching students to write programs were initially based on experience in programming digital computers for non-educational use, despite extensive research and publications, it would seem that the teacher of today is not in a much better position to justify teaching programming than the original pioneers.
机译:本文关注两种编程语言的历史的某些局限性,这两种语言是为学习数字计算机编程的学生而专门设计的:基本语言和徽标。重点是这些语言的创始者的教育目标和理念截然不同。比较它们并勾勒出它们在学校中的早期使用。尽管最初要教学生编写程序的原因是基于对非教育用途的数字计算机进行编程的经验,但是尽管进行了广泛的研究和发表,但今天的老师似乎没有比讲授编程更好的理由了。最初的开拓者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号