首页> 外文OA文献 >Dictionary Use and EFL Learning. A Contrastive Study of Pocket Electronic Dictionaries and Paper
【2h】

Dictionary Use and EFL Learning. A Contrastive Study of Pocket Electronic Dictionaries and Paper

机译:词典使用和EFL学习。袖珍电子词典和论文的对比研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pocket electronic dictionaries (PEDs) are gaining in popularity with an increasing number of EFL learners inChinese colleges and universities and making an impact on the Chinese dictionary scene which is too great toignore. This study compares patterns of use and perceptions of PEDs and paper dictionaries (PDs). It also examinesthe effects of dictionary use on vocabulary acquisition under PED and PD conditions. Some different patterns of usebetween PEDs and PDs are identified, which seem to result from design features of different types of dictionaries.PEDs and PDs are perceived as with different advantages and disadvantages. It is also found that there are nosignificant differences between PED and PD use in comprehension, production and retention of vocabulary althoughthe speed of the former is significantly faster than the latter.
机译:袖珍电子词典(PED)在中国高校中越来越多的EFL学习者中越来越流行,并且对中文字典界产生了巨大的影响,不容忽视。这项研究比较了PED和纸质词典(PD)的使用方式和认知方式。它还检查了在PED和PD条件下词典使用对词汇习得的影响。确定了PED和PD之间的某些不同使用模式,这似乎是由不同类型的词典的设计特征导致的.PED和PD被认为具有不同的优缺点。还发现,尽管前者的速度明显快于后者,但在理解,产生和保留词汇方面,PED和PD的使用之间没有显着差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen Yuzhen; 陈玉珍;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号