首页> 外文OA文献 >Freedom of Speech Practice in China and Sweden - International News Reports Comparisons - Libya Civil War 2011 as a Case Study
【2h】

Freedom of Speech Practice in China and Sweden - International News Reports Comparisons - Libya Civil War 2011 as a Case Study

机译:中国和瑞典的言论自由实践 - 国际新闻报道比较 - 2011年利比亚内战案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Freedom of Speech is a universal human right. Article 19 of the ICCPR (the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".China has a reputation that invests amount of resources building up media censorship system to control Chinese media; While Sweden claims that “freedom of speech” is the principles of Sweden media industry. In this research, the author will focus on both Chinese and Swedish newspapers reporting towards international news materials. The research question is “How Chinese newspaper differs from Swedish newspaper on reporting international news?” and the aim focuses the area of media comparison in different cultural backgrounds, and tries to find the differences in between.The theories of Freedom of Expression, intercultural communication and media studies are related in this research, including Propaganda model and Stereotypes, Globalization: media technology and social change, Media censorship studies.As case study, Swedish and Chinese newspapers reports towards Libya Civil War 2011 is used in the research - since it is one of the biggest news in the world this year, which brings great quantity of news articles for the research. In order to do data analysis, both quantitative research and qualitative research method are used in this paper.As the research result, the differences between Swedish and Chinese newspapers on reporting international news are quite clear – they have different article quantities; choose different news topics; express different political standpoints and have different reporting methods and news focus. Eventually, the contribution of this research can be in the field of media reporting comparison between different cultural backgrounds. Further research can be conducted in this area as well.
机译:言论自由是一项普遍人权。 《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》(《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》)第十九条规定:“人人有权享有不受干涉的意见”和“人人都有表达自由的权利;这项权利应包括寻求,接受,接受和接受的自由。并通过口头,书面或印刷形式,艺术形式或通过他选择的任何其他媒介,传播各种类型的信息和思想,无论是口头,边际”。中国享有声誉,它投入了大量资源来建立媒体控制中国媒体的审查制度;瑞典声称“言论自由”是瑞典媒体行业的原则。在这项研究中,作者将专注于报道国际新闻材料的中国和瑞典报纸。研究问题是“中国报纸在报道国际新闻方面与瑞典报纸有何不同?”表达自由,跨文化交际和媒体研究的理论与本研究相关,包括宣传模型和刻板印象,全球化:媒体,目的是关注不同文化背景下的媒体比较领域,并试图找出两者之间的差异。技术和社会变革,媒体审查研究。作为案例研究,瑞典和中国报纸对2011年利比亚内战的报道被用于该研究-因为这是今年世界上最大的新闻之一,带来了大量新闻报道用于研究。为了进行数据分析,本文采用了定量研究和定性研究两种方法。作为研究结果,瑞典和中国报纸在报道国际新闻方面的差异很明显。选择不同的新闻主题;表达不同的政治立场,并具有不同的报道方法和新闻重点。最终,这项研究可以在不同文化背景之间的媒体报道比较领域做出贡献。也可以在这一领域进行进一步的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang Yuan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号