首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of History >The Nordic Countries from War to Cold War - and Today 1 1 This text is based on a keynote speech delivered at the international historical conference on ‘The Nordic Countries: From War to Cold War, 1944-51’, hosted by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office at London on 1 April 2011. View all notes
【24h】

The Nordic Countries from War to Cold War - and Today 1 1 This text is based on a keynote speech delivered at the international historical conference on ‘The Nordic Countries: From War to Cold War, 1944-51’, hosted by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office at London on 1 April 2011. View all notes

机译:北欧国家从战争到冷战-以及今天的 1 1本文基于在1944年-北欧国家:从战争到冷战的国际历史会议上发表的主题演讲。 51’,由英国外交和联邦事务部于2011年4月1日在伦敦主办。查看所有笔记

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

History is much present for the British and Nordic peoples, which means it can also be controversial and instrumentalized. Documents like the new FCO collection help to remind us that the past was truly in some ways ‘another country’. In the early post-war years, for example, before collective nuclear deterrence, there was huge uncertainty both over the scale of Communist advances and the viability of Western defence. The Nordic defence pact alternative thus deserved serious thought, but the reasons for its ultimate sidelining carry lessons still relevant today about the limits and functionality of Nordic cooperation. Interestingly, Britain seemed (and seems?) driven to repeatedly seek more from the latter than it can deliver. While close, British-Nordic relations were and remain prone to misapprehension and ruffled sensitivities caused inter alia by different ‘mental maps’ and group-building instincts. The documents underline the perennial role of Ambassadors in attempting to translate Nordic realities to London, albeit with a constant risk of being over-frustrated or over-charmed by one's hosts.View full textDownload full textKeywordsScandinavia, Great Britain, Cold War, foreign policy, Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, security, Soviet Union, Nordic cooperationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.665665
机译:对于英国和北欧人民来说,历史是很重要的,这意味着它也可以引起争议和工具化。诸如新的FCO收藏之类的文件有助于提醒我们过去在某些方面确实是“另一个国家”。例如,在战后初期,在集体核威慑之前,共产主义进步的规模和西方国防的生存能力都存在巨大的不确定性。因此,北欧防卫条约的替代方案值得认真考虑,但是其最终的副业理由仍在今天就北欧合作的局限性和功能性具有重要意义。有趣的是,英国似乎(而且似乎?)被迫反复地向后者寻求更多的东西,以至于它无法提供。亲近的英北欧关系过去并仍然容易由于各种“心理地图”和群体建设的本能而引起误解和敏感。这些文件突显了大使们在试图将北欧现实转化为伦敦方面常年发挥的作用,尽管不断有被主人所挫败或迷住的风险。查看全文下载全文关键字斯堪的纳维亚半岛,英国,冷战,外交政策,丹麦,冰岛,芬兰,瑞典,挪威,安全,苏联,北欧合作有关的变量,google,更多“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.665665

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号