首页> 外文OA文献 >Voltage, Stability and Diffusion Barrier Differences between Sodium-ion and Lithium-ion Intercalation Materials
【2h】

Voltage, Stability and Diffusion Barrier Differences between Sodium-ion and Lithium-ion Intercalation Materials

机译:钠离子和锂离子嵌入材料之间的电压,稳定性和扩散阻挡差异

摘要

To evaluate the potential of Na-ion batteries, we contrast in this work the difference between Na-ion and Li-ion based intercalation chemistries in terms of three key battery properties—voltage, phase stability and diffusion barriers. The compounds investigated comprise the layered AMO2 and AMS2 structures, the olivine and maricite AMPO4 structures, and the NASICON A3V2(PO4)3 structures. The calculated Na voltages for the compounds investigated are 0.18–0.57 V lower than that of the corresponding Li voltages, in agreement with previous experimental data. We believe the observed lower voltages for Na compounds are predominantly a cathodic effect related to the much smaller energy gain from inserting Na into the host structure compared to inserting Li. We also found a relatively strong dependence of battery properties on structural features. In general, the difference between the Na and Li voltage of the same structure, ΔVNa–Li, is less negative for the maricite structures preferred by Na, and more negative for the olivine structures preferred by Li. The layered compounds have the most negative ΔVNa–Li. In terms of phase stability, we found that open structures, such as the layered and NASICON structures, that are better able to accommodate the larger Na+ ion generally have both Na and Li versions of the same compound. For the close-packed AMPO4 structures, our results show that Na generally prefers the maricite structure, while Li prefers the olivine structure, in agreement with previous experimental work. We also found surprising evidence that the barriers for Na+ migration can potentially be lower than that for Li+ migration in the layered structures. Overall, our findings indicate that Na-ion systems can be competitive with Li-ion systems.
机译:为了评估Na离子电池的潜力,我们在这项工作中对比了基于Na离子和Li离子的插层化学在三个关键电池属性(电压,相稳定性和扩散势垒)方面的差异。研究的化合物包括分层的AMO2和AMS2结构,橄榄石和马来石AMPO4结构以及NASICON A3V2(PO4)3结构。与先前的实验数据一致,所研究化合物的计算得出的Na电压比相应的Li电压低0.18–0.57V。我们认为,观察到的Na化合物较低的电压主要是阴极效应,与插入Li相比,将Na插入主体结构所获得的能量要小得多。我们还发现电池特性对结构特征的依赖性较强。通常,相同结构的Na和Li电压之间的差ΔVNa–Li对于Na所优选的马来石结构来说,负值较小,而对于Li所优选的橄榄石结构,则值更大。层状化合物的ΔVNa-Li负值最大。在相稳定性方面,我们发现更好地适应较大Na +离子的开放结构(如分层结构和NASICON结构)通常具有相同化合物的Na和Li版本。对于紧密堆积的AMPO4结构,我们的结果表明,与先前的实验工作相一致,Na通常更喜欢马氏体结构,而Li更喜欢橄榄石结构。我们还发现了令人惊讶的证据,即层状结构中Na +迁移的障碍可能低于Li +迁移的障碍。总体而言,我们的发现表明,钠离子系统可以与锂离子系统竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号