首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of bacterial culture and qPCR testing of rectal and pen floor samples as diagnostic approaches to detect enterotoxic Escherichia coli in nursery pigs
【2h】

Comparison of bacterial culture and qPCR testing of rectal and pen floor samples as diagnostic approaches to detect enterotoxic Escherichia coli in nursery pigs

机译:比较直肠和笔底样品的细菌培养和qpCR测试作为检测保育猪肠毒性大肠杆菌的诊断方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) are a major cause of diarrhoea in weaned pigs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement at pen level among three different diagnostic approaches for the detection of ETEC in groups of nursery pigs with diarrhoea. The diagnostic approaches used were: bacterial culturing of faecal samples from three pigs (per pen) with clinical diarrhoea and subsequent testing for virulence genes in E. coli isolates; bacterial culturing of pen floor samples and subsequent testing for virulence genes in E. coli isolates; qPCR testing of pen floor samples in order to determine the quantity of F18 and F4 genes. The study was carried out in three Danish pig herds and included 31 pens with a pen-level diarrhoea prevalence of 25%, as well as samples from 93 diarrhoeic nursery pigs from these pens. All E. coli isolates were analysed by PCR and classified as ETEC when genes for one or more adhesin factors and one or more enterotoxins were detected. Results: A total of 208 E. coli colonies from pig samples and 172 E. coli colonies from pen floor samples were isolated. Haemolytic activity was detected on blood agar plates in 111 (29.2%) of the 380 colonies that were isolated. The only adhesin factor detected in this study was F18. When comparing bacterial culture or qPCR testing of pen floor samples with detection of ETEC-positive diarrhoeic pigs by culture, agreement was found in 26 (83.9%, Kappa = 0.665) and 23 (74.2%, Kappa = 0.488) of the pens, respectively. Agreement was observed between the detection of ETEC by bacterial culture and qPCR in the same pen floor sample in 26 (83.9%, Kappa = 0.679) pens. Conclusion: We observed an acceptable agreement for the detection of ETEC-positive diarrhoeic nursery pigs in pen samples for both bacterial culture of pen floor samples and qPCR. This study showed that both bacterial culture and qPCR testing of pen floor samples can be used as a diagnostic approach for detecting groups of ETEC-positive diarrhoeic nursery pigs.
机译:产肠毒素的大肠杆菌(ETEC)是断奶猪腹泻的主要原因。这项研究的目的是评估在腹泻保育猪组中三种不同诊断方法中ETEC的检测在笔水平上的一致性。使用的诊断方法是:细菌培养三只猪(每只)的粪便样本(每支猪),并伴有腹泻,并随后检测大肠杆菌中的毒力基因。笔底样品的细菌培养以及大肠杆菌分离物中毒力基因的后续测试; q笔地板样品的qPCR测试,以确定F18和F4基因的数量。该研究在三只丹麦猪群中进行,包括31支钢笔,其腹泻率> 25%,以及来自这些钢笔的93只腹泻保育猪的样本。当检测到一种或多种粘附素因子和一种或多种肠毒素的基因时,通过PCR分析所有大肠杆菌分离株并将其归类为ETEC。结果:总共从猪样本中分离出208个大肠杆菌菌落,从笔底样品中分离出172个大肠杆菌菌落。在分离的380个菌落中,有111个(29.2%)的血琼脂板上检测到溶血活性。在这项研究中检测到的唯一粘附素因子是F18。在比较笔底样品的细菌培养或qPCR测试与通过培养检测ETEC阳性腹泻猪时,分别在26支(83.9%,Kappa = 0.665)和23支(74.2%,Kappa = 0.488)中发现一致。在同一支笔底样品中的26支(83.9%,Kappa = 0.679)笔中,通过细菌培养检测到ETEC和qPCR之间观察到一致。结论:我们观察到在笔样品的细菌培养和qPCR方面都可以检测笔样品中ETEC阳性腹泻的保育猪。这项研究表明,笔底样品的细菌培养和qPCR测试都可以用作检测ETEC阳性腹泻保育猪群的诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号