首页> 外文OA文献 >Environmental Assessment of Integrated Food and Cooking Fuel Production for a Village in Ghana
【2h】

Environmental Assessment of Integrated Food and Cooking Fuel Production for a Village in Ghana

机译:加纳一个村庄的食品和烹饪燃料综合生产环境评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Small-scale farming in Ghana is typically associated with synthetic fertilizer dependence and soil degradation. The farmers often rely on wood fuel for cooking imported from outside the farmland, a practice that is associated with deforestation. Integration of food and energy production may be a holistic approach to solving these issues. We study four approaches to providing food and fuel for cooking in a small-scale farming community. Present practice (PP) of synthetic fertilizer based food production and provision of wood fuel from outside the farming area is compared to three modeled, integrated technology options: integrated food and household-scale biogas production (HH Biogas), integrated food and village-scale biogas production (Village Biogas), and integrated food and wood fuel production (Agroforestry). Integrated approaches are able to eliminate the import of wood fuel, reduce synthetic fertilizer use by 24%, 35% and 44% and soil loss by 15%, 20%and 87%, respectively, compared to present practice. An Emergy Assessment (EmA) shows that integrated approaches are relevant substitutes to present practice considering biophysical efficiency indicated by Unit Emergy Value (in solar emjoules (sej) per J of output) and dependence on renewable inputs indicated by the Global Renewability Fraction (in %): 2.6–3.0 × 10 sej/J and 38%–48% (PP), 2.5–2.8 × 10 sej/J and 41%–46% (HH Biogas), 2.4–2.6 × 10 sej/J and 45%–47% (Village Biogas),1.7–2.4 × 10 sej/J and 49%–66% (Agroforestry). Systematic recycling and use of local resources may play a pivotal role in reducing the dependence on non-renewable resources in Ghanaian farming,ensuring long-term soil fertility and stemming the current deforestation of wood reserves.
机译:加纳的小规模耕作通常与合成肥料的依赖和土壤退化有关。农民通常依靠木材燃料来从农田以外进口,这与森林砍伐有关。粮食和能源生产的一体化可能是解决这些问题的整体方法。我们研究了在小型农业社区中为烹饪提供食物和燃料的四种方法。将目前以合成肥料为基础的食品生产和从耕种区以外提供木材燃料的做法(PP)与三种模型化的综合技术方案进行了比较:综合粮食和家庭规模沼气生产(HH沼气),综合粮食和村庄规模沼气生产(乡村沼气),以及粮食和木材燃料综合生产(农林业)。与目前的做法相比,综合方法能够消除木质燃料的进口,分别减少24%,35%和44%的合成肥料使用以及15%,20%和87%的土壤流失。能值评估(EmA)表明,综合方法是当前实践的相关替代方法,考虑到单位能值(单位为J的太阳能量(sej))所表示的生物物理效率,以及全球可再生性分数所表示的对可再生输入的依赖(%) ):2.6–3.0×10 sej / J和38%–48%(PP),2.5–2.8×10 sej / J和41%–46%(HH沼气),2.4–2.6×10 sej / J和45% –47%(村庄沼气),1.7–2.4×10 sej / J和49%–66%(农林业)。系统的回收利用和当地资源的使用可能在减少加纳农业对非可再生资源的依赖,确保长期土壤肥力和阻止当前森林砍伐森林方面发挥关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号