首页> 外文OA文献 >Shopping on daily deal websites: how numbers of previous purchases make a difference in product purchase intentions
【2h】

Shopping on daily deal websites: how numbers of previous purchases make a difference in product purchase intentions

机译:在每日交易网站上购物:先前购买的数量如何影响产品购买意图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A recent phenomenon in retail marketing, ‘daily deal’ websites offer products for sale for a limited time and at heavily discounted rates. Given the relative newness of the daily deal websites, empirical studies are limited. A key distinction of ‘daily deal’ sites from other online vouchers and online auctions is that the numbers of items sold are displayed. The focus of this paper is to examine whether being told how many people have already purchased the item influences a shopper’s choice. In particular this research seeks to examine whether there was a bandwagon (those who wish to conform) or snob effect (those who do not wish to conform) when number of previous purchases were shown. Prior literature has shown the existence of bandwagon and snob effects in shopping situations. However, no study to date looks at these two concepts on a daily deal website, and no study in particular measures purchase intention based on these two concepts. This study seeks to fill this gap. This study examines shoppers’ buying behaviour when exposed to a high, low or no number of previous purchases on a daily deal website, and whether this behaviour is different when the shopper is influenced by the snob or bandwagon effect. Using an experiment, shoppers were exposed to the same daily deal website, offering the same product, with only the number of purchases manipulated – high, low, or no information. A total of 219 students were randomly divided into three equal groups of 73 and assigned to one of the three treatments – high, low or no information on purchase numbers. Results showed there to be no difference between snobs, bandwagoners, or even neutrals, when the prior purchase level was low, high, or not revealed. It is suspected that the urgency factor maybe an explanation. Further research would be useful to first see if these results are replicated with other products – particularly services. Second, it would be worthwhile introducing a measure of the urgency effect, and seeing if this indeed moderates the need for uniqueness effect.
机译:零售营销中最近出现的一种情况是,“每日交易”网站在有限的时间内以非常优惠的价格出售产品。考虑到日常交易网站的相对更新,实证研究是有限的。 “每日交易”网站与其他在线凭证和在线拍卖的主要区别在于,显示了已售商品的数量。本文的重点是研究是否被告知已经购买了多少物品会影响购物者的选择。特别是,这项研究试图在显示以前购买的数量时检查是否存在“追赶者”(希望遵守的人)或势利效应(“不想遵守”的人)。先前的文献表明,在购物环境中存在潮流和势利效应。但是,到目前为止,尚无研究在日常交易网站上研究这两个概念,也没有针对这两个概念的购买意向特别衡量方法。本研究旨在填补这一空白。这项研究调查了购物者在日常交易网站上有高,低或无数量的先前购买时的购买行为,以及当购物者受到势利势或潮流影响时,这种行为是否有所不同。通过实验,购物者可以访问相同的每日交易网站,提供相同的产品,而只操纵购买次数–高,低或无信息。总共219名学生被随机分为三组,每组73个,并分配给三种治疗方法之一-高,低或无购买数量信息。结果显示,当先前的购买水平为低,高或未显示时,势利者,追赶者甚至中性者之间没有差异。怀疑紧急因素可能是一种解释。进一步的研究对于首先了解这些结果是否可以与其他产品(尤其是服务)重复使用很有用。其次,值得引入一种对紧迫性影响的度量,并观察这是否确实减轻了对独特性影响的需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ali Herow (Ashleigh);

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号