首页> 外文OA文献 >Error analysis in a learner corpus : a study of errors amongst Grade 12 Oshiwambo speaking learners of English in northern Namibia
【2h】

Error analysis in a learner corpus : a study of errors amongst Grade 12 Oshiwambo speaking learners of English in northern Namibia

机译:学习者语料库中的错误分析:对纳西比亚北部12年级Oshiwambo英语学习者的错误进行研究

摘要

High failure rates in English as a second language at secondary school level have become a concern in the Namibian education sector. From 2005 until 2013, the overall performance of the grade 12 learners in English as a second language on Ordinary level in the Oshana region was unsatisfactory. In fact, only a minority (18.52 percent) of the grade 12 learners obtained a grading in the range of A to D in comparison to the majority (81.48 percent) of learners who obtained a grading of E to U. The poor performance was attributed to: poor sentence structure, syllabification and spelling (Directorate of National Examination and Assessment, 2007-2010). The causes of these low performance rates however, were not scientifically explored in this region. Therefore this study embarked on an investigation in order to identify the reasons behind the low performance rates of the grade 12 Oshiwambo speaking learners of English and to determine whether the impressionistic results from the Directorate’s report correlate with the present study’s findings. In order to understand the dynamic linguistic system of the learners, a contrastive analysis of Oshiwambo and English was done in order to investigate the potential origins of some of the errors. An error analysis approach was also used to identify, classify and interpret the non-standard forms produced by the learners in their written work. Based on the results obtained from this study, a more comprehensible assessment rubric was devised to help identify learners’ written errors. A group of 100 learners from five different schools in the Oshana region was asked to write an essay of 150 to 200 words in English. The essays were analysed using Corder’s (1967) conceptual framework which outlines the steps that a researcher uses when undertaking an error analysis study. The errors were categorised according to Keshavarz’s (2006) linguistic error taxonomy. Based on this taxonomy, the results revealed that learners largely made errors in the following categories: phonology/orthography, morpho-syntax, lexico-semantics, discourse and techniquepunctuation. The study concluded that these errors were most likely due to: first language interference, overgeneralisation, ignorance of rule restriction and carelessness. Other proposed probable causes were context of learning and lack of knowledge of English grammar. The study makes a significant contribution, in that the findings can be used as a guide for the Namibian Ministry of Education in improving the status quo at schools and informing the line Ministry on various methods of dealing with language difficulties faced by learners. The findings can also empower teachers to help learners with difficulties in English language learning, thereby enabling learners to improve their English language proficiency. The study has proposed methods of intervention in order to facilitate the teaching of English as a second language in the Oshana region. In addition, the study has devised an easily applied assessment rubric that will assist in identifying non-standard forms of language used by learners. The reason for designing a new rubric is because the rubric which is currently being used is believed to be subjective, inconsistent and lacks transparency.
机译:在中学阶段英语作为第二语言的高失败率已成为纳米比亚教育部门的关注点。从2005年到2013年,奥沙那地区12年级英语学习者作为第二普通语言的整体表现并不理想。实际上,与获得E到U评分的大多数学习者(81.48%)相比,只有少数(18.52%)的12年级学习者获得了A到D的评分。到:句子结构,音节和拼写不良(国家考试和评估局,2007-2010年)。然而,在该地区没有科学地探究这些低效率的原因。因此,本研究着手进行一项调查,以查明Oshiwambo 12年级英语学习者学习成绩偏低的原因,并确定该局报告中的印象派结果是否与本研究结果相关。为了理解学习者的动态语言系统,对Oshiwambo和英语进行了对比分析,以调查某些错误的潜在根源。错误分析方法还用于识别,分类和解释学习者在书面作品中产生的非标准形式。根据从这项研究中获得的结果,设计了一种更易于理解的评估规则,以帮助识别学习者的书面错误。要求来自奥沙纳地区五所不同学校的100名学习者写一篇150至200个单词的英语文章。本文是使用Corder(1967)的概念框架进行分析的,该框架概述了研究人员在进行错误分析研究时所使用的步骤。根据Keshavarz(2006)的语言错误分类法对错误进行了分类。根据这种分类法,研究结果表明,学习者在以下类别中主要犯了错误:语音/正字法,形态句法,词汇语义,话语和技术标点。该研究得出的结论是,这些错误最有可能是由于:第一语言干扰,过度概括,对规则限制的无知和粗心造成的。提出的其他可能原因是学习背景和英语语法知识不足。该研究做出了重大贡献,因为这些发现可以作为纳米比亚教育部的指南,以改善学校的现状,并向线下教育部通报处理学习者面临的语言困难的各种方法。研究结果还可以增强教师的能力,帮助有英语学习困难的学习者,从而使学习者能够提高英语水平。这项研究提出了干预方法,以促进奥沙那地区英语作为第二语言的教学。此外,研究还设计了一种易于应用的评估规则,可帮助识别学习者使用的非标准语言形式。设计新专栏的原因是因为当前使用的专栏被认为是主观的,不一致的并且缺乏透明度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nghikembua Annelie Ndapanda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号