首页> 外文OA文献 >The relationship between customer satisfaction and revenue: an empirical study within the corporate banking division of a South African bank
【2h】

The relationship between customer satisfaction and revenue: an empirical study within the corporate banking division of a South African bank

机译:客户满意度与收入之间的关系:南非银行公司银行部门的实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a quantitative study which explores whether there is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction as perceived by corporate customers and revenue generated from such customers of the corporate division of a single South African bank. This research report has three sections, namely the (1) academic paper which comprises a condensed literature review, research methods, results and discussion, (2) an expanded literature review, and (3) an expanded research methodology. Although these three sections are interrelated, they may be considered stand-alone documents. A review of literature contends that customer satisfaction has been a topic of interest for over four decades when, in 1965, the concept was first introduced to literature by Cardozo. Even in these early stages it was hypothesized that higher customer satisfaction would lead to repeat purchasing and cross selling. Thus, for some time, researchers have proposed that a link exists between customer satisfaction and a company’s bottom line, ultimately alluding to the notion of positive associations between customer satisfaction, revenue and profitability. The corporate banking division of a South African bank has dedicated significant time and economic resources to monitoring and improving the satisfaction of their corporate customers each year. With a focus on this single corporate banking division, this quantitative study used secondary customer satisfaction data to establish whether a positive relationship between customer satisfaction with a bank representative or more formally termed, the ‘transactional banker’ (TB) and revenue at an account level exists. The study used a one-dimensional customer satisfaction construct summated from several variables or a one-dimensional multi item scale. This quantitative study made use of secondary data obtained through customer satisfaction surveys conducted with the division’s clients in three waves during September 2010, March 2011 and September 2011. At the time of data collection, telephone interviews were conducted with individuals in corporations who were customers of the corporate division within the bank. These individuals in their respective corporations were identified and surveyed because they (a) managed the primary relationship of the corporation with the banking division and (b) were senior financial decision makers of their organization’s (i.e. had the ability to influence a decision to change banks). Sample sizes of 273 (September 2010), 259 (March 2011) and 310 (September 2011) individual corporate customers were achieved through a method of stratified sampling. In this study, customers were stratified according to the TB who is responsible for their account. Within each stratum a random sample of 10 – 15 participants were included for each of the 30 TB’s. Monthly revenue data, recorded as a) credit revenue, b) overdraft revenue and c) total revenue was sourced from internal company records for each month from September 2010 to January 2012. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess whether a positive correlation between the two variables of customer satisfaction and revenue exists. This was followed by Ordinary Least Square Regression to investigate the magnitude and nature of the relationship between customer satisfaction and revenue using customer satisfaction as the independent variable and revenue as the response variable. Cronbach’s alpha was also used for internal scale validity. The results of the research indicated no statistically significant relationship between a customer’s satisfaction with the performance of their TB and either the credit, overdraft or total revenue generated from such a customer through their account. By highlighting this, these findings, nevertheless, contribute to the growing body of knowledge examining the impact of customer satisfaction efforts on revenue. On the basis of the findings of this study, it cannot be practically recommended that customer satisfaction efforts be terminated or changed within the organization of study owing to several study limitations which were present. Firstly, the study was hampered by small sample sizes due to a lack of the availability of revenue data in some instances, particularly in the case of overdraft revenue. Secondly, the study only focused on a single bank account held with the bank and increases and decreases in revenue based on the balances held within that single account. Since one of the purported consequences of improved customer satisfaction is the purchase of additional products, the current design of the study does not take into account the take up of additional accounts or banking products with the bank. Thus, an increase in revenue for the bank as a whole due to the purchase of additional accounts may be masked. Similarly, the scope of the study does not extend to examining the effect of recommendations made by these corporate customers to others and hence growth of divisional or bank revenue due to the addition of new customers. Finally, this quantitative study does not examine revenue growth when compared to customer satisfaction improvements over time due to a limited sample of customers taking part in the study over a number of periods as well as incomplete revenue data. The recommendations for future research are to examine the relationship between changes in customer satisfaction and changes in revenue at divisional level in the long run within the South African banking industry as the impact of an increase in customer satisfaction may be obscured by salient factors in the short run. It is also suggested that future research look at the correlation between dissatisfaction and revenue, where adequate sample sizes are available. Theoretically, the results of this research do bring into serious question the universal application, especially in the context of the South African banking industry of the Service Profit Chain and Satisfaction Profit Chain which propagate the existence of a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and revenue.
机译:这是一项定量研究,探讨了公司客户所感知的客户满意度与一家南非银行的公司部门的此类客户所产生的收入之间是否存在正相关关系。本研究报告分为三个部分,即(1)学术论文,其中包括简明的文献综述,研究方法,结果和讨论;(2)扩展的文献综述;以及(3)扩展的研究方法。尽管这三个部分是相互关联的,但它们可以被视为独立文档。对文献的评论认为,客户满意度一直是四个世纪以来的一个热门话题,1965年,Cardozo首次将这个概念引入文学。即使在这些早期阶段,也可以假设更高的客户满意度会导致重复购买和交叉销售。因此,一段时间以来,研究人员提出,客户满意度和公司的底线之间存在联系,最终暗示了客户满意度,收入和利润率之间存在正向关联的概念。南非一家银行的公司银行部门每年投入大量时间和经济资源来监控和提高其公司客户的满意度。该定量研究着眼于单个公司银行部门,使用二级客户满意度数据来确定客户对银行代表或更正式地称为“交易银行家”(TB)与客户级别收入之间的正相关关系存在。该研究使用一维客户满意度构造,该构造由多个变量求和或一维多项目量表。这项定量研究利用了通过在2010年9月,2011年3月和2011年9月三阶段与该部门的客户进行的客户满意度调查获得的辅助数据。在收集数据时,对作为公司客户的公司中的个人进行了电话采访。银行内的公司部门。识别并调查了他们各自公司中的这些人,因为他们(a)管理公司与银行部门的主要关系,并且(b)是其组织的高级财务决策者(即具有影响更换银行的决定的能力) )。通过分层抽样的方法,获得了分别为273个(2010年9月),259个(2011年3月)和310个(2011年9月)个人企业客户的样本量。在本研究中,根据负责其帐户的结核病对客户进行了分层。在每个层中,随机抽取了30 TB的10-15个人作为样本。月收入数据记录为a)信用收入,b)透支收入和c)总收入来自2010年9月至2012年1月每个月的内部公司记录。使用Pearson相关系数评估两者之间是否存在正相关存在客户满意度和收入的变量。随后进行普通最小二乘回归,以客户满意度为自变量,以收入为响应变量,研究客户满意度与收入之间关系的大小和性质。克朗巴赫(Cronbach)的alpha也用于内部量表的有效性。研究结果表明,客户对其结核病表现的满意度与该客户通过其帐户产生的信用,透支或总收入之间在统计上没有显着关系。通过强调这一点,这些发现仍然有助于不断发展的知识体系,以检验客户满意度对收入的影响。根据这项研究的发现,由于存在一些研究局限性,因此实际上不建议终止或改变研究组织内的客户满意度工作。首先,由于在某些情况下(特别是在透支收入的情况下)缺乏收入数据的可用性,该研究由于样本量小而受到阻碍。其次,该研究仅关注在该银行拥有的单个银行账户,并基于该单个账户内的余额来增加或减少收入。由于所谓的提高客户满意度的后果之一就是购买了其他产品,因此,当前的研究设计并未考虑到银行对其他帐户或银行产品的使用。因此,可以掩盖由于购买额外帐户而导致的银行整体收入的增加。相似地,研究范围并未扩展到检查这些公司客户向他人提出的建议的效果,以及由于增加新客户而导致部门或银行收入增长的情况。最后,由于在一定时期内参与该研究的客户样本有限以及收入数据不完整,因此与客户满意度随时间的改善相比,本定量研究并未检查收入增长。未来研究的建议是,在南非银行业中,从长远来看,长期来看客户满意度的变化与部门级别收入变化之间的关系,因为短期内的显着因素可能会掩盖客户满意度提高的影响跑。还建议在有足够样本量的情况下,将来的研究应关注不满与收入之间的相关性。从理论上讲,这项研究的结果确实对普遍应用提出了严重的质疑,特别是在南非银行业的服务利润链和满意度利润链的背景下,这种传播传播了客户满意度和收入之间存在正向关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Richter Leonie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号