首页> 外文OA文献 >Rachmaninoff, Horowitz, and the discursive arena between (re)composition and performance : the case of Rachmaninoff's Piano Sonata, opus 36
【2h】

Rachmaninoff, Horowitz, and the discursive arena between (re)composition and performance : the case of Rachmaninoff's Piano Sonata, opus 36

机译:拉赫玛尼诺夫,霍洛维茨和(重新)作曲与表演之间的话语场景:拉赫玛尼诺夫的钢琴奏鸣曲案例,作品36

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This treatise aims to uncover possible reasons as to why composers rework their compositions. In attempting to answer questions regarding musical and extra-musical (referential) criteria, surrounding conditions and the role performers play in acting as conduits of the aforementioned, the study focuses on three versions of Rachmaninoff’s second Piano Sonata, opus 36. The first of these was composed in 1913, the second constitutes the composer’s revision of this work in 1931, and the third, a subsequent amalgamation of both previously mentioned versions by pianist Horowitz in 1943. The research is grounded in the theoretical ideas of organicist musical structuralism and thematic/motivic transformation (Reti), musical hermeneutics and phenomenology, musical forces (Larsen) and authenticity in musical performance (Taruskin). In addition this study explores methods of critical reading that may be used to disclose the conflicting yet complementary demands of “conciseness” and “drama” contained within the parameters of the three aforementioned versions of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Sonata Op. 36. An introductory chapter is followed by one in which a historical context provides the intertextual matrix against which the musical personae of Rachmaninoff and Horowitz, as well as the three versions of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Sonata Op. 36, may be understood. The chapter thereafter provides a concise overview of the history of musical analysis and the Tendenzwende which signified the change from a purely positivistic analytical approach to a post-modernist perspective on musical critique, against which background a motivation is provided for the analytical approaches applied in this treatise. Chapters 4 and 5 present detailed readings of the sonata from the perspective of “conciseness” and “drama” respectively. In conclusion, the final chapter reflects on findings made and conclusion drawn, with particular reference to the authenticity debate in current musicological discourse.
机译:本论文旨在揭示作曲家为何重新创作作品的可能原因。在试图回答有关音乐和音乐外(参考)标准,周围环境以及表演者在上述行为中所扮演的角色的问题时,该研究着眼于拉赫玛尼诺夫的第二钢琴奏鸣曲,作品36的三种版本。于1913年创作,第二部构成作曲家对该作品的修订,1931年,第三部随后由钢琴家Horowitz于1943年合并了上述两个版本。这项研究基于有机主义音乐结构主义和主题/动机转变(Reti),音乐诠释学和现象学,音乐力量(拉森)和音乐表演的真实性(Taruskin)。此外,本研究还探讨了批判性阅读的方法,这些方法可用于揭示上述三个版本的拉赫玛尼诺夫的《钢琴奏鸣曲》的参数中所包含的“简洁”和“戏剧性”的矛盾但互补的要求。 36.在介绍性章节之后是一章,其中历史背景提供了拉赫玛尼诺夫和霍洛维茨的音乐人格以及拉赫玛尼诺夫的《钢琴奏鸣曲》三个版本的互文矩阵。 36,可以理解。此后的章节简要概述了音乐分析和Tendenzwende的历史,这标志着从纯粹实证主义的分析方法到音乐批评的后现代主义观点的转变,在此背景下,人们为音乐分析方法的应用提供了动力。论文。第4章和第5章分别从“简洁”和“戏剧”的角度介绍了奏鸣曲的详细内容。总而言之,最后一章反映了所做的发现和得出的结论,特别是参考了当前音乐学话语中的真实性辩论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maritz Gerhardus Petrus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号