首页> 外文OA文献 >Income Smoothing over the Business Cycle: Changes in Banks’ Coordinated Management of Provisions for Loan Losses and Loan Charge-offs from the Pre-1990 Bust to the 1990s Boom
【2h】

Income Smoothing over the Business Cycle: Changes in Banks’ Coordinated Management of Provisions for Loan Losses and Loan Charge-offs from the Pre-1990 Bust to the 1990s Boom

机译:经济周期收入平稳:银行对1990年以前至20世纪90年代的贷款损失和贷款冲销协调管理的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We provide evidence that banks smooth income by managing provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs in a coordinated fashion that varies across the bust and boom phases of the business cycle and across homogeneous and heterogeneous loan types. In particular, during the 1990s boom, we predict and find that banks accelerated provisioning for loan losses and made this less obvious by accelerating loan charge-offs, especially for homogenous loans for which charge-offs are determined using number-of-days-past-due rules. We also provide evidence that the valuation implications of banks’ provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs vary across the phases of the business cycle and loan types reflecting the effect of these factors on banks’ income smoothing. In particular, during the 1990s boom, we predict and find that charge-offs of homogenous loans have a positive association with current returns and future cash flows, because these charge-offs are recorded primarily by healthy banks with good future prospects reducing over-stated allowances for loan losses. We also predict and find that these charge-offs have a positive association with future returns that is explained by their positive association with future net income and recoveries. Our results are consistent with the market only partially appreciating healthy banks’ overstatement of charge-offs of homogeneous loans based on number-of-days-past-due rules during the 1990s boom, because of the perceived non-discretionary nature of these charge-offs.
机译:我们提供的证据表明,银行通过以协调的方式管理贷款损失和贷款冲销的准备金来平滑收入,这种方式在商业周期的萧条时期和繁荣时期以及同质和异质贷款类型之间有所不同。尤其是在1990年代的繁荣时期,我们预测并发现银行加快了贷款损失准备金的计提,并通过加快贷款核销的方式使这种损失变得不那么明显,尤其是对于按天数来确定冲销额的同质贷款-适当的规则。我们还提供证据表明,银行对贷款损失和贷款冲销的准备金的估值影响在整个业务周期的各个阶段中有所不同,贷款类型反映了这些因素对银行收入平滑的影响。尤其是在1990年代的繁荣时期,我们预测并发现同质贷款的冲销与当前收益和未来现金流量呈正相关,因为这些冲销主要是由健康的银行记录的,这些银行的良好前景具有良好的前景,减少了多报的状况贷款损失准备金。我们还预测并发现,这些冲销与未来收益呈正相关,这可以通过与未来净收入和回收率呈正相关来解释。我们的结果与市场一致,只是市场部分赞赏健康银行对1990年代繁荣时期基于过期天数规则的同类贷款冲销的夸大其词,因为这些冲销被认为具有非决定性的性质,断断续续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号