首页> 外文OA文献 >Structures and stability of medium-sized silicon clusters. III. Reexamination of motif transition in growth pattern from Si\u3csub\u3e15\u3c/sub\u3e to Si\u3csub\u3e20\u3c/sub\u3e
【2h】

Structures and stability of medium-sized silicon clusters. III. Reexamination of motif transition in growth pattern from Si\u3csub\u3e15\u3c/sub\u3e to Si\u3csub\u3e20\u3c/sub\u3e

机译:中型硅团簇的结构和稳定性。 III。重新审视生长模式中的基序转换从si \ u3csub \ u3e15 \ u3c / sub \ u3e到si \ u3csub \ u3e20 \ u3c / sub \ u3e

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been established from experiments that stable medium-sized ionic clusters Si15–Si20 are prolate in shape. Density-functional theories (DFTs) also predict that nearly all low-lying neutral clusters in this size range are prolate in shape. Moreover, most of them are built onto two generic structural motifs, either the tricapped-trigonal-prism (TTP) Si9 motif or the six/six Si6/Si6 (sixfold-puckered hexagonal ring Si6 plus six-atom tetragonal bipyramid Si6) motif. However, it appears that the exact location of the TTP-to-six/six motif transition is dependent on the functional (e.g., PBE or BLYP) used in the DFT calculations. Here, we present total-energy calculations for two series of clusters (one series containing six/six motif and the other containing the TTP motif) in the size range of Si16–Si20. The calculations were based on all-electron DFT methods with a medium [6-311G (2d)] and a large (cc-pVTZ) basis sets, as well as coupled-cluster single and double substitutions (including triple excitations) [CCSD(T)] method with a modest (cc-pVDZ) basis set. In the DFT calculations, two popular hybrid density functionals, the B3LYP and PBE1PBE, were selected. It is found that the B3LYP total-energy calculations slightly favor the six/six motif, whereas the PBE1PBE calculations slightly favor the TTP motif. The CCSD(T) total-energy calculations, however, show that isomers based on the six/six motif are energetically slightly favorable in the size range of Si16-Si20. Hence, the TTP-to-six/six motif transition is more likely to occur at Si16.
机译:通过实验已经确定,稳定的中型离子簇Si15–Si20呈长圆形。密度泛函理论(DFT)还预测,在此大小范围内,几乎所有低洼中性星团的形状都是扁长的。而且,它们中的大多数都建立在两个通用的结构基序上,或者是三重三角形棱镜(TTP)Si9基序,或者是六/六Si6 / Si6(六折起皱的六角环Si6加六原子四方双锥Si6)基序。然而,看来TTP到六/六基序转变的确切位置取决于在DFT计算中使用的功能(例如,PBE或BLYP)。在这里,我们介绍了Si16–Si20尺寸范围内的两个系列簇的总能量计算(一个系列包含六个/六个基序,另一个包含TTP基序)。该计算基于具有中等[6-311G(2d)]和较大(cc-pVTZ)基集的全电子DFT方法,以及耦合簇的单取代和双取代(包括三重激发)[CCSD( T)]方法,并设置适当的(cc-pVDZ)基础。在DFT计算中,选择了两个流行的混合密度函数B3LYP和PBE1PBE。发现B3LYP总能量计算稍微偏爱6/6模体,而PBE1PBE计算稍微偏向TTP模体。然而,CCSD(T)的总能计算表明,基于六/六基序的异构体在Si16-Si20的尺寸范围内在能量上稍微有利。因此,从TTP到6/6的基序过渡更可能发生在Si16。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号