首页> 外文OA文献 >Extending the Verb Classifier Hypothesis: Aspectual Prefixes as Sortal Classifiers in Slavic and Procedural Prefixes as Mensural Classifiers in East Slavic and Bulgarian
【2h】

Extending the Verb Classifier Hypothesis: Aspectual Prefixes as Sortal Classifiers in Slavic and Procedural Prefixes as Mensural Classifiers in East Slavic and Bulgarian

机译:扩展动词分类器假设:在斯拉夫语和程序前缀中作为分类分类符的方面前缀作为东斯拉夫语和保加利亚语中的语法分类器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Janda 2012 and Janda et al. 2013 presented the hypothesis that Russian aspectual prefixes serve as verb classifiers, similar to verb classifiers identified in Australian languages, and as the verbal analogs of numeral classifiers found primarily in Asia and Central America. We further extend this hypothesis in two directions. First, we make the point that the distinction between sortal classifiers (that classify items based on inherent properties such as shape) and mensural classifiers (that classify based on non-inherent measures) are relevant also to the verbal domain. In other words, the distinction for numeral classifiers we see in Table 1 has a parallel in the verbal domain. Russian uses prefixes as both a) sortal classifiers, as in na-pisat’ where na- sorts pisat’ among verbs involving accumulation on a surface (an inherent property); and as b) mensural classifiers in the formation of procedural verbs such as po-stonat’ ‘groan for a while’ where an external measure is imposed on an activity. Classifier Type Numeral Classifier Noun Sortal yi ‘one’ tiao CL: long-thin shengzi rope Mensural yi ‘one’ bei CL: glass pijiu beer Table 1: The Numeral Classifier Construction in Mandarin Chinese Whereas Janda 2012 and Janda et al. 2013 focused only on Natural Perfectives (where the prefixes have a “purely perfectivizing” function, as in na-pisat’ ‘write’) and only on Russian, we argue that the use of prefixes as the verbal analog of sortal classifiers can be extended also to Specialized Perfectives (where the prefix brings additional meaning to a perfective, as in pere-pisat’ ‘rewrite’), and that all Slavic languages have sortal verb classifiers used in the formation of Natural and Specialized Perfectives. We further show parallels between the radial category structure of the meanings of numeral classifiers and the meanings of Slavic prefixes, as well as the foregrounding and weak definiteness effects of bare classifier constructions in languages such as Cantonese or Vietnamese and of perfective verbs in East Slavic and Bulgarian.
机译:Janda 2012和Janda等。 2013年提出了这样的假设:俄语方面的前缀充当动词分类器,类似于澳大利亚语言中识别的动词分类器,并且充当主要在亚洲和中美洲发现的数字分类器的语言类似物。我们进一步从两个方向扩展了这一假设。首先,我们指出排序分类器(基于形状等固有属性对项目进行分类)和心理分类器(基于非固有量度进行分类)之间的区别也与言语领域相关。换句话说,我们在表1中看到的数字分类器的区别在语言领域中是平行的。俄语同时使用前缀作为a)排序分类器,例如在na-pisat'中,其中na-pisat'在涉及表面积累(固有属性)的动词中进行排序; b)作为过程动词形式的心理分类器,例如po-stonat的“一阵子gro吟”,其中对一项活动施加了外部措施。分类器类型数字分类器名词分类“一”调CL:细长生子绳“一”号CL:玻璃酒杯表1:普通话数字分类器的构造,而Janda 2012和Janda等。 2013年仅关注自然完美词(前缀具有“完全完美”的功能,如na-pisat的“ write”),而仅关注俄语,我们认为可以扩展使用前缀作为排序分类器的口头模拟也适用于专业完美词(如pere-pisat的“ rewrite”一样,前缀为完美词带来了更多的含义),并且所有斯拉夫语言都有用于自然和专业完美词形成的分类动词分类器。我们进一步展示了数字分类器含义的径向类别结构与斯拉夫前缀的含义之间的相似之处,以及粤语或越南语中的裸分类器构造的前瞻性和弱确定性效应以及东斯拉夫语和英语中的完美动词保加利亚语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号