首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of Nonlinear Aerobic Training on Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Function Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
【2h】

Effects of Nonlinear Aerobic Training on Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Function Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

机译:非线性有氧训练对临床局部前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍和心血管功能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major adverse effect of radical prostatectomy (RP). We conducted a randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of aerobic training (AT) compared with usual care (UC) on ED prevalence in 50 men (n = 25 per group) after RP. AT consisted of five walking sessions per week at 55–100% of peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) for 30–60 min per session following a nonlinear prescription. The primary outcome was change in the prevalence of ED, as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), from baseline to 6 mo. Secondary outcomes were brachial artery flow–mediated dilation (FMD), VO2peak, cardiovascular (CV) risk profile (eg, lipid profile, body composition), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The prevalence of ED (IIEF score ≤21) decreased by 20% in the AT group and by 24% in the UC group (difference: p = 0.406). There were no significant between-group differences in any erectile function subscale (p > 0.05). Significant between-group differences were observed for changes in FMD and VO2peak, favoring AT. There were no group differences in other markers of CV risk profile or PROs. In summary, nonlinear AT does not improve ED in men with localized prostate cancer in the acute period following RP.
机译:勃起功能障碍(ED)是前列腺癌根治术(RP)的主要不良反应。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以检查有氧训练(AT)与常规护理(UC)在RP后50名男性中的ED患病率(每组n = 25)相比。根据非线性处方,AT每周进行五次散步,每次吸氧量峰值(VO2peak)为55-100%,每次服用30-60分钟。主要结局是根据国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)测量的ED患病率从基线到6 mo的变化。次要结果是肱动脉血流介导的扩张(FMD),VO2peak,心血管(CV)风险特征(例如,脂质特征,身体成分)和患者报告的结果(PRO)。 AT组的ED患病率(IIEF得分≤21)降低了20%,而UC组的患病率降低了24%(差异:p = 0.406)。在任何勃起功能子量表中,组间差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。观察到FMD和VO2peak的变化存在明显的组间差异,有利于AT。在CV风险特征或PRO的其他指标上没有组别差异。总之,在RP后的急性期,非线性AT不能改善局部前列腺癌男性的ED。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号