首页> 外文OA文献 >Interrelationships among Teacher Self-Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge
【2h】

Interrelationships among Teacher Self-Efficacy, Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge

机译:教师自我效能感,集体教师效能感与教师教育内容知识的相互关系

摘要

A teacher’s self and collective efficacies are assumed to be related to his or her teaching and student learning in a specific content area. His or her pedagogical content knowledge in the subject content area is also assumed to shape his or her teaching practice. In addition, the quality of one’s teaching is influenced by the context in which teaching is situated. However, the relationships among teacher self-efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and pedagogical content knowledge situated in individualist and collectivist contexts of teaching mathematics have not been empirically examined adequately. Through the lens of social cognitive theory on teacher efficacy, situated learning perspectives, and concept of pedagogical content knowledge this study examined four research questions around the interrelationships between teacher self-efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and pedagogical content knowledge in two different teaching contexts, the US and China, and explored the difference between Chinese and U.S. mathematics teaching contexts.Using survey data from secondary mathematics teachers in the US and China, this study employed quantitative research methodology with both parametric and nonparametric methods, including chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlation to answer the research questions. The results showed that there was a significant difference between Chinese and U.S. mathematics teaching contexts: the former was more collectivist-oriented and the latter was more individualist-oriented. Compared to their Chinese counterparts, U.S. mathematics teachers scored significantly lower and fewer frequencies on observing instructional practice, critiquing, and providing feedback to their colleagues’ teaching. Chinese teachers reported a significant higher score in teacher self-efficacy related to specific teaching tasks, while U.S. teachers reported a significant higher score in teacher self-efficacy related to general teaching tasks. Chinese teacher scored significant higher in group-competence and collaboration and collegiality than their U.S. colleagues, while there was no significant difference in cooperation between Chinese and U.S. teachers. The results also revealed that for Chinese teachers, their specific self-efficacy was significantly associated with their group-competence, cooperation, and general self-efficacy was significantly related to group-competence, cooperation, and collaboration and collegiality; while for U.S. teachers, their general self-efficacy was significantly but negatively correlated with collaboration and collegiality. In addition, the results also showed that for Chinese teachers neither teacher self-efficacy nor collective efficacy was significantly related to pedagogical content knowledge; for U.S. teachers, only specific self-efficacy was significantly and positively correlated with pedagogical content knowledge.This study contributes to the knowledge base for understanding mathematics teaching contexts in China and the US, which were assumed as collectivist and individualist but have not examined empirically. It also deepens the understanding of the relationships among teacher self-efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge situated within individualist and collectivist teaching contexts. The findings of this study were discussed in relation to the teaching/teacher cultures in China and the US, characterized by collectivist and individualist cultures, the different emphases of mathematics teacher preparation, and distinct curriculum and assessment systems. Implications were also addressed regarding mathematics teacher education practice, research in teacher self-efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and pedagogical content knowledge, and cross-cultural comparison.
机译:假定教师的自我效能和集体效能与他或她在特定内容领域的教学和学生学习有关。还假定他或她在主题内容区域中的教学内容知识可以影响他或她的教学实践。此外,一个人的教学质量会受到教学所处环境的影响。但是,教师的自我效能感,集体教师的效能和教学内容知识在个人主义和集体主义教学环境中的关系尚未得到足够的经验检验。通过关于教师效能,所处学习视角和教学内容知识概念的社会认知理论的视角,本研究围绕四个不同的教学环境中教师自我效能,集体教师效能和教学内容知识之间的相互关系,研究了四个研究问题,本文利用美中两国中学数学教师的调查数据,采用定量研究方法,并结合参数和非参数方法,包括卡方检验,方差分析(ANOVA)和相关性以回答研究问题。结果表明,中美数学教学环境之间存在显着差异:前者更注重集体主义,而后者更注重个人主义。与中国同行相比,美国数学老师在观察教学实践,进行批判和向同事的教学提供反馈方面的得分明显降低。中国教师报告说与特定教学任务相关的教师自我效能感显着较高,而美国教师报告说与一般教学任务相关的教师自我效能感显着较高。中国老师的团队合作能力,协作能力和合作性得分明显高于美国同事,而中美教师之间的合作没有显着差异。研究结果还表明,对于中文教师来说,他们的具体自我效能感与他们的团队能力,合作能力显着相关,而总体自我效能感与群体能力,合作性,协作能力和合作能力显着相关。而对于美国教师而言,他们的总体自我效能感与协作和合作能力显着相关,但呈负相关。此外,研究结果还表明,对于中文教师而言,教师的自我效能感和集体效能感与教学内容知识均无显着相关。对于美国教师而言,只有特定的自我效能才与教学内容知识显着正相关。本研究为了解中美数学教学环境提供了知识基础,这被认为是集体主义和个人主义的,但没有进行实证检验。它还加深了对个人自我和集体主义教学情境中教师自我效能感,集体教师效能和教师教学内容知识之间关系的理解。讨论了这项研究的结果,涉及中美两国的教学/教师文化,其特点是集体主义和个人主义文化,数学老师准备的不同重点以及独特的课程和评估系统。还对数学教师的教育实践,教师自我效能感的研究,集体教师的效能,教学内容知识以及跨文化比较等方面提出了建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shi Qingmin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:05:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号