首页> 外文OA文献 >Aid Patterns in Central Eastern Europe. EUMA Special Series Vol. 5 No. 19, December 2008
【2h】

Aid Patterns in Central Eastern Europe. EUMA Special Series Vol. 5 No. 19, December 2008

机译:中东欧的援助模式。 EUma特别系列卷。 2008年12月5日第19号

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Central-Eastern European (CEE) and Baltic countries have undergone significant political and economic transformations since the 1990s. One transition that has not yet received sufficient scholarly attention is the shift in regional aid flows. Starting in the mid 1990s, this trend saw CEE and Baltic countries emerge as donors of foreign aid from a prior condition as net recipients. Why have these new democracies strived to make that change, to systematically begin to give foreign aid? What are the patterns of aid giving that they follow? Evidence suggests that all the donor countries in the CEE and Baltic regions behaved similarly to each other as they institutionalized their own aid flows patterns. This research hypothesizes that: 1) national governments have determined their overall levels of aid spending in response to pressures and incentives from international organizations; 2) political and economic interests play a key role in determining top recipients of bilateral aid. Thus, donor interest overrides recipient need.
机译:自1990年代以来,中东欧(CEE)和波罗的海国家经历了重大的政治和经济转型。尚未得到足够学术关注的一种转变是区域援助流量的转移。从1990年代中期开始,这一趋势使中东欧和波罗的海国家逐渐成为外国援助的捐助者,而这些国家是先决条件的净接受者。为什么这些新民主国家努力做出改变,有系统地开始提供外国援助?他们遵循的援助方式是什么?有证据表明,中欧和波罗的海地区的所有捐助国在制度化自己的援助流动方式时,其行为都相似。本研究假设:1)各国政府根据国际组织的压力和鼓励措施确定了其援助支出的总体水平; 2)政治和经济利益在确定双边援助的最大接受者方面起着关键作用。因此,捐助者的利益超过了接受者的需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vavrečková Markéta.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号