首页> 外文OA文献 >Gas explosion venting: comparison of experiments with design standards and laminar flame venting theory
【2h】

Gas explosion venting: comparison of experiments with design standards and laminar flame venting theory

机译:瓦斯爆炸排气:实验与设计标准和层流火焰排气理论的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

European and USA design standards for gas explosion venting are quite different in their predictions, with the European standards always giving a higher predicted explosion Pred for the same vent coefficient, Kv. The format of the two predictions are different with the US standards following the approach of Swift expressing the vent area as a ratio to the surface area of the vessel, As/Av and the European standard using the vent coefficient approach. Kv= V2/3/Av. It is shown that these two approaches are directly related as As is proportional to V2/3. The reactivity parameter in the US standards is the laminar burning velocity, UL, and in the European venting standards it is the deflagration parameter, KG = dp/dtmax/V1/3. It is shown that these two reactivity parameters are linearly related. The USA standard is shown to be compatible with spherical flame venting theory and with experimental data other than that of Bartknecht. There is also good agreement with the present results for a 10L vented vessel for which the spherical laminar flame venting theory gives reasonable agreement but predicts the Pred to be higher than measured. This is because of the assumption that at the maximum value of Pred the bulk flame area is equal to As which is not valid. The US standard also has corrections for flame self acceleration, which is a vessel size effect, and for the influence of vessel size on the external explosion, which are not factors addressed in the European standards. The European standard is the equation for the results of Bartknecht for a 10 m3 vessel and the results of higher and lower volumes in Bartknecht’s results are all lower that for 10 m3. The experimental results reviewed, for methane and propane maximum reactivity vented explosions, include data for vessels larger than that on which the European standards are based and they all give significantly lower values of Pred than those of Bartknecht..
机译:欧洲和美国的气体爆炸排放设计标准在预测上有很大的不同,对于相同的排放系数Kv,欧洲标准总是给出更高的预测爆炸Pred。两种预测的格式与美国标准不同,这是根据Swift表示通风口面积与容器表面积之比的方法,美国标准的As / Av和使用排气系数方法的欧洲标准。 Kv = V2 / 3 / Av。结果表明,这两种方法直接相关,因为As与V2 / 3成正比。美国标准中的反应性参数是层流燃烧速度UL,而欧洲通风标准中的反应性参数是爆燃参数KG = dp / dtmax / V1 / 3。结果表明,这两个反应性参数是线性相关的。事实证明,美国标准与球形火焰排放理论以及除Bartknecht以外的实验数据兼容。对于一个10升的排气容器,其当前结果也取得了很好的一致性,球面层流排气理论给出了合理的一致性,但预测Pred会高于测量值。这是因为假设在Pred的最大值处,大块火焰面积等于As,这是无效的。美国标准还针对火焰自加速(这是容器尺寸的影响)以及容器尺寸对外部爆炸的影响进行了修正,而欧洲标准中没有考虑这些因素。欧洲标准是10立方米船舶的Bartknecht结果的方程式,而Bartknecht结果的高低容积结果都低于10 m3。回顾的实验结果显示,甲烷和丙烷的最大反应性爆炸产生的爆炸数据包括大于欧洲标准所依据的容器的数据,并且它们给出的Pred值均明显低于Bartknecht。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号