首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures
【2h】

Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures

机译:风险和期货的规避风险和寻求风险的投资者偏好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and futures prices by using the mean-variance (MV) criterion and stochastic dominance (SD) approach. The MV findings cannot distinguish between the preferences of spot and futures markets. However, the SD tests show that spot dominates futures in the downside risk, while futures dominate spot in the upside profit. On the other hand, the SD findings suggest that spot dominates futures in downside risk, while futures dominate spot in upside profit. Risk-averse investors prefer investing in the spot index. Risk seekers are attracted to the futures index to maximize their expected utility but not expected wealth in the entire period, as well as for both the OPEC and Iraq War sub-periods. The SD findings show that there is no arbitrage opportunity between the spot and futures markets, and these markets are not rejected as being efficient.
机译:本文使用均值方差(MV)标准和随机优势度(SD)方法研究了投资者对石油现货和期货价格的规避风险和寻求风险的偏好。 MV结果无法区分现货市场和期货市场的偏好。但是,SD测试显示,现货在下跌风险中占主导地位,而期货在上涨利润中占主导地位。另一方面,可持续发展研究的结果表明,现货在下跌风险中占主导地位,而期货在上涨利润中占主导地位。规避风险的投资者喜欢投资现货指数。寻求风险的人被期货指数所吸引,以在整个期间以及欧佩克和伊拉克战争两个时期最大化其预期效用,而不是预期财富。 SD的结果表明,现货市场和期货市场之间没有套利机会,并且这些市场也没有被认为是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号