首页> 外文期刊>International review of economics & finance >Preferences of risk-averse and risk-seeking investors for oil spot and futures before, during and after the Global Financial Crisis
【24h】

Preferences of risk-averse and risk-seeking investors for oil spot and futures before, during and after the Global Financial Crisis

机译:在全球金融危机之前,之中和之后,偏好避险和寻求风险的投资者对石油现货和期货的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and futures prices by using the mean-variance (MV) criterion, the CAPM statistics, and stochastic dominance (SD) approach. The MV criterion shows that risk averters are indifferent from the oil spot and futures but risk seekers prefer to invest in oil futures to spot. The information drawn from the CAPM statistics does not lead to any preference between spot and futures prices. Our SD results reveal that risk-averse investors prefer the spot index, whereas risk seekers are attracted to the futures index to maximize expected utility, though not their expected wealth for the entire period as well as for the sub-period (pre-GFC) before the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the sub-period during and after the GFC (GFC). To compare the performance of spot in pre-GFC and GFC sub-periods, we find that the 2008 GFC has no impact on the means, variances, and the CAPM statistics. In addition, our SD analysis reveals that spots from pre-GFC and GFC do not dominate each other, both risk averters and risk seekers are indifferent from the spots from pre-GFC and GFC, there is no arbitrage opportunity for spots before and after GFC, and the spot market is efficient to the GFC crisis. The same conclusion is drawn on the impact of the GFC on the futures. The findings in our paper could provide more information to academics, practitioners, and policy makers in their derision toward oil spot and futures markets as well as toward the impact of any financial crisis in the future. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文使用均值方差(MV)准则,CAPM统计数据和随机优势(SD)方法研究了石油现货和期货价格的规避风险和寻求风险的投资者偏好。 MV标准表明,避险者对现货和期货无动于衷,但风险寻求者更愿意投资于现货石油。从CAPM统计数据中获得的信息不会导致现货和期货价格之间的任何偏好。我们的可持续发展结果表明,规避风险的投资者更喜欢现货指数,而寻求风险的投资者却被期货指数吸引,以最大限度地提高预期效用,尽管并非整个时期以及子时期(GFC之前)的预期财富在2008年全球金融危机(GFC)之前以及GFC期间和之后的子时期(GFC)。为了比较现货在GFC之前和GFC子时段的表现,我们发现2008 GFC对均值,方差和CAPM统计数据没有影响。此外,我们的SD分析显示,GFC之前和GFC之前的现货不会相互支配,风险规避者和风险寻求者对GFC之前和GFC之前的现货都无动于衷,GFC之前和之后的现货都没有套利机会,现货市场对GFC危机有效。关于全球金融危机对期货的影响也得出了相同的结论。本文的研究结果可以为学者,从业者和决策者提供更多信息,帮助他们嘲笑石油现货和期货市场以及未来任何金融危机的影响。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号