首页> 外文OA文献 >International trade, real wages and technical progress: The specific factors model
【2h】

International trade, real wages and technical progress: The specific factors model

机译:国际贸易,实际工资和技术进步:具体因素模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been over fifty years since Stolper and Samuelson (1941) pointed out that whereas free trade may be beneficial to a country in aggregate terms, even a broadbased factor such as labor may be hurt by the price changes which trade brings about. In particular, a staple of Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory is that relatively capital-abundant countries tend to import commodities which are produced by labor-intensive techniques at home, and the competition which such trade engenders serves to depress real wages. Recent battles to obtain passage of the NAFTA accord and Uruguay Round of GATT agreements in the United States have focused on the overall gains which freer trade is likely to produce, and have suggested, perhaps only implicitly, that the gains are sufficient to compensate potential losers among the working class. Such compensation schemes, however, are rarely introduced, although certain sections of the economy may achieve exceptions to a move to more liberal trade. Changes in the global trading scenario are taking place against a background of advances in technology. Technical progress in a country is generally expected to benefit most productive factors, but strict adherence to a narrow Heckscher-Ohlin interpretation suggests that if technical progress at home is centered in capital-intensive sectors, real wages will suffer, regardless of the capital-saving or labor-saving bias in technical change. Such a drop in real wages would be even more pronounced if simultaneously foreign countries are expanding the world output of labor-intensive products, both because of advances in foreign technology in these areas and, perhaps especially, because of the arrival of new labor-abundant countries into the world trading community. Elsewhere (Jones, 1995) I have agued that bias in technical progress and the possibility of variations in the bundles of commodities produced can play a role in letting Heckscher-Ohlin theory predict a richer and more realistic set of outcomes. The Heckscher-Ohlin model, however, is not the only model which can be used to analyze trade issues. In this paper I focus on the consequences of technical progress for real wages in a model in which labor is a mobile factor and sectors produce outputs by combining labor with human or physical capital that is tied to a particular industry, at least in the short run Although the sector-specific model easily accommodates many sectors, for ease of exposition the analysis focusses on the two-commodity case.
机译:自斯托尔珀和萨缪尔森(1941)指出,尽管自由贸易总体上可能对一个国家有利,但是距贸易之类的广泛因素,例如劳动力,可能会因贸易带来的价格变化而受到损害,已经过去了五十多年。尤其是,赫克歇尔-奥林贸易理论的主要内容是,相对资本充裕的国家倾向于进口本国通过劳动密集型技术生产的商品,而这种贸易产生的竞争会降低实际工资。最近为争取通过北美自由贸易协定和关贸总协定的乌拉圭回合而进行的斗争集中在更自由贸易可能产生的总体收益上,并且可能只是隐含地暗示,这些收益足以弥补潜在的失败者在工人阶级中。但是,尽管经济的某些部分可能会实现向更自由贸易的转变,但很少采用这种补偿方案。全球贸易情况的变化是在技术进步的背景下发生的。通常预期一个国家的技术进步将使大多数生产要素受益,但是严格遵守狭义的Heckscher-Ohlin解释表明,如果本国的技术进步集中在资本密集型部门,那么无论资本节省多少,实际工资都会受到影响。或在技术变革中节省劳动力的偏见。如果外国同时在世界范围内扩大劳动密集型产品的产量,那么这种实际工资的下降将更加明显,这既是由于这些地区外国技术的进步,也可能是由于大量新劳动力的到来国家融入世界贸易社区。在其他地方(琼斯,1995年),我质疑技术进步的偏见以及所生产的商品捆变化的可能性,可以使Heckscher-Ohlin理论预测更丰富,更现实的结果。但是,赫克斯彻-奥林模型并不是唯一可以用来分析贸易问题的模型。在本文中,我关注的是技术进步对实际工资的影响,在这种模型中,劳动力是一个移动因素,而各部门通过结合劳动力以及与特定行业相关的人力或物力资本来产生产出,至少在短期内如此尽管特定于部门的模型可以轻松容纳许多部门,但是为了便于说明,分析着重于两种商品的情况。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones Ronald Winthrop;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号