首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing Feed-In-Tariffs and Renewable Obligation Certificates - a Real Option Approach
【2h】

Comparing Feed-In-Tariffs and Renewable Obligation Certificates - a Real Option Approach

机译:比较上网电价和可再生债务证书 - 一种实物期权方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increase of the share of renewable energy in total energy production is a stated goal of environmental and industrial policy in many developed countries. Governments adopt regulation to support the investment into renewable energy infrastructure, in particular in power generation. Two main policy instruments emerge: renewable quotas and feedin-tariffs. Quota systems, such as the British ROCs, oblige an electricity producer to certify that a fixed share of his electricity is 'green', i.e. generated from renewable sources. Feed-in-tariffs, such as the German EEG tariffs, guarantee a certain, fixed price for 'green' electricity, depending on the technology. The decisive difference between the instruments is the allocation of price risk. The paper presents a real option framework to study the effect the instruments on investment and innovation of renewable energy plants. The modelled is calibrated on data for German Wind power plants. We find that the propensity to invest is higher under a quota system. So the presence of price risk spurs technological innovation.
机译:在许多发达国家,可再生能源在总能源生产中所占份额的增加是环境和产业政策的既定目标。各国政府通过法规来支持对可再生能源基础设施的投资,特别是在发电方面的投资。出现了两种主要的政策工具:可再生配额和上网电价。配额制度(例如英国的中华民国)要求电力生产商证明其电力的固定份额是“绿色”的,即由可再生资源产生。上网电价,例如德国EEG的电价,可以根据技术保证一定的“绿色”电价。两种工具之间的决定性差异是价格风险的分配。本文提出了一个实物期权框架,以研究这些工具对可再生能源工厂的投资和创新的影响。该模型已根据德国风力发电厂的数据进行了校准。我们发现,在配额制度下,投资倾向更高。因此,价格风险的存在刺激了技术创新。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mennel Tim; Scatasta Sara;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号