首页> 外文OA文献 >A Review of What Instructional Designers Do: Questions Answered and Questions Not Asked
【2h】

A Review of What Instructional Designers Do: Questions Answered and Questions Not Asked

机译:回顾什么教学设计师做的:回答的问题和没有问的问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this literature review was to determine what evidence there is that instructional designers apply ID Models, as well as to establish what other activities and processes they might use in their professional activities. Only ten articles were located that directly pertained to this topic: seven reporting on empirical research and three case descriptions recounting development experiences. All ten papers pertained to process-based ID models. Results showed that, while instructional designers apparently do make use of process-based ID models, they do not spend the majority of their time working with them nor do they follow them in a rigid fashion. They also engage in a wide variety of other tasks that are not reflected in ID models.
机译:这篇文献综述的目的是确定有哪些证据表明教学设计者应用了ID模型,并确定了他们在其专业活动中可能使用的其他活动和过程。仅找到与该主题直接相关的十篇文章:七篇关于实证研究的报告和三篇描述发展经验的案例描述。所有十篇论文都与基于流程的ID模型有关。结果表明,尽管教学设计人员显然确实使用了基于流程的ID模型,但他们并没有花费大部分时间与他们合作,也没有严格遵循它们。他们还从事ID模型中未反映的各种其他任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号