首页> 外文OA文献 >Demythologising skimming :the operationalisation teaching and practice of skimming in a second language with special reference to the IELTS test
【2h】

Demythologising skimming :the operationalisation teaching and practice of skimming in a second language with special reference to the IELTS test

机译:Demythologising略读:操作化教学和练习第二语言略读,特别参考雅思考试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite its prominence, especially in academic reading, skimming is much underudresearched with very few research papers devoted to it, of which only two are L2-udrelated. Such research as there is suggests that skimming is most likely to be effectiveudwhen the text is predictable, familiar and simple (in terms of content, structure,udlanguage or any combination of these). This study considers skimming within an L2udcontext (specifically, skimming for the IELTS test). In particular, it investigates theudspecific characteristics of skimming. In addition, it considers the relationship betweenudskim reading texts with familiar and unfamiliar content. The pedagogy-focused enquiryudconsists of an analysis of the way 14 textbooks cover skimming and a further analysis ofud92 questionnaire responses from IELTS teachers. The learner-focused enquiry analysesud16 verbal protocols, collected from participants who had read texts with familiar andudunfamiliar content.udThe textbooks examined implied that skimming is extremely useful for IELTSudcandidates, though there was no unanimity about the speed of skimming or itsudoperationalisation. Similarly, the teachers surveyed almost unanimously endorsed theudvalue of skimming for test-takers but varied greatly in their methods of teaching andudeven in their understanding of the extent to which it can be taught. Analysis of theudverbal protocols revealed a number of strategies that were used by skim readers, audcomparison with Anderson's (1991) list of strategies for normal reading indicating theudparticular emphasis of skim readers on time-saving and gist-yielding strategies.udComparison of quantitative data showed no major differences in scores betweenudskimming texts of familiar and unfamiliar content, although the participants' perceptionudof difference, with the text with unfamiliar content being perceived as far more difficult,udwas acute. It was concluded that there is a continuum from normal reading toudskimming: thus skimming is a variant of normal reading and not a separate process fromudit.
机译:尽管略读非常突出,特别是在学术阅读中,但是对略读的研究还很不足,很少有专门针对它的研究论文,其中只有两篇与L2-ud相关。已有的研究表明,当文本是可预测的,熟悉的和简单的(就内容,结构,语言或它们的任意组合而言)时,略读最可能有效。这项研究考虑了在L2 udcontext中进行略读(特别是针对IELTS考试的略读)。特别是,它研究了撇脂的 udspecific特性。另外,它还考虑了 udskim阅读内容熟悉和不熟悉的文本之间的关系。以教育学为重点的询问 udcons包括对14本教科书中有关略读的方式进行分析,并进一步分析了雅思考试教师对 ud92问卷的回答。以学习者为中心的询问分析 ud16口头协议,从曾阅读过熟悉和 udunfamily内容的参与者那里收集。 ud教科书暗示撇取对雅思考试 udcandidates极其有用,尽管关于skimming的速度没有一致意见或其非操作化。同样,接受调查的教师几乎一致认可了考生的“略读”价值,但是他们的教学方法差异很大,甚至理解了可以接受的程度。对 udual协议的分析显示,脱脂读者使用了许多策略,与Anderson(1991)的正常阅读策略列表进行了比较,表明 s脱脂读者特别强调节省时间和轻率的策略。 ud定量数据的比较显示,熟悉和不熟悉内容的 udskimm文本之间的得分没有重大差异,尽管参与者的感知 udof差异很大,其中不熟悉内容的文本被认为更加困难, ud是尖锐的。得出的结论是,从正常阅读到粗读之间存在连续性:因此,粗读是正常阅读的一种变体,而不是与粗读分开的过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rodgers John Martyn Henry;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号