首页> 外文OA文献 >Mediterranean Forecasting System: forecast and analysis assessment through skill scores
【2h】

Mediterranean Forecasting System: forecast and analysis assessment through skill scores

机译:地中海预报系统:通过技能分数进行预测和分析评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes the first evaluation of thequality of the forecast and analyses produced at the basinscale by the Mediterranean ocean Forecasting System (MFS)(http://gnoo.bo.ingv.it/mfs). The system produces short-termocean forecasts for the following ten days. Analyses are producedweekly using a daily assimilation cycle. The analysesare compared with independent data from buoys, whereavailable, and with the assimilated data before the data areinserted. In this work we have considered 53 ten days forecastsproduced from 16 August 2005 to 15 August 2006.The forecast skill is evaluated by means of root meansquare error (rmse) differences, bias and anomaly correlationsat different depths for temperature and salinity, computingdifferences between forecast and analysis, analysisand persistence and forecast and persistence. The Skill Score(SS) is defined as the ratio of the rmse of the difference betweenanalysis and forecast and the rmse of the differencebetween analysis and persistence. The SS shows that at 5 and30m the forecast is always better than the persistence, but at300m it can be worse than persistence for the first days ofthe forecast. This result may be related to flow adjustmentsintroduced by the data assimilation scheme. The monthlyvariability of SS shows that when the system variability ishigh, the values of SS are higher, therefore the forecast hashigher skill than persistence.We give evidence that the error growth in the surface layersis controlled by the atmospheric forcing inaccuracies, while at depth the forecast error can be interpreted as due to thedata insertion procedure. The data, both in situ and satellite,are not homogeneously distributed in the basin; therefore, thequality of the analyses may be different in different areas ofthe basin.
机译:本文介绍了对地中海地区预报系统(MFS)在流域尺度上产生的预报和分析质量的首次评估(http://gnoo.bo.ingv.it/mfs)。系统会在接下来的十天内产生短期海洋预报。使用每日同化周期每周进行一次分析。将分析与来自浮标的独立数据(如果有)进行比较,并与插入数据之前的同化数据进行比较。在这项工作中,我们考虑了2005年8月16日至2006年8月15日的53天十天预报,通过均方根误差(rmse)差异,温度和盐度在不同深度的偏倚和异常相关性,计算预报与预报之间的差异来评估预报技巧。分析,分析和持久性以及预测和持久性。技能得分(SS)定义为分析和预测之间的均方根与分析和持久性之间的均方根之比。 SS显示,在5和30m时,预报总是好于持久性,但在300m时,预报的头几天可能会比持久性差。该结果可能与数据同化方案引入的流量调整有关。 SS的月变化表明,当系统变化较大时,SS的值较高,因此预测的技巧要比持久性高。我们提供了证据,表明大气强迫作用不精确所控制的地表层误差的增长,而在深度上的预测错误可以解释为由于数据插入过程。盆地中的原位和卫星数据都不均匀分布。因此,流域不同地区的分析质量可能有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号