首页> 外文OA文献 >Modernist objects / objects under modernity: a philosophical reading of Discrete series
【2h】

Modernist objects / objects under modernity: a philosophical reading of Discrete series

机译:现代性下的现代主义客体/物体:离散系列的哲学解读

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis is the first book-length treatment of the poems in George Oppen’s Discrete Series (1934), providing a counterbalance to critical readings of Oppen’s work which have to date focused on work published after his return to poetry (i.e. from 1962 onwards). It is a philosophical presentation of the work which argues that the poems are themselves philosophical presentations of objects, and by those objects and that presentation, of the historical circumstances of those objects and the poems themselves. ududIts method is Adornian in three senses: first, it holds that literature is not only subject-matter for a (sub)subset of philosophy but a potential mode of participation within it; second, the philosophical writing with which the thesis puts the poems into dialogue is not a single authorship nor strictly aesthetic, but a broad range of writings by Kant, Hegel, Marx and Nietzsche (with a special emphasis on Hegel); and third, continual recourse is made to Adorno’s own writings on art and objecthood.ududAfter a brief account of the pre-history of Objectivism, of Oppen’s connection with Ezra Pound, and the circumstances of the work’s production and appearance, the poems are analysed in depth alongside more thoroughly institutionally validated works by, among others, Pound and T.S. Eliot. The main focus of these readings is on the physical objects represented: their nature, type, consistency, and the fact and manner of their presentation. These objects are characterised by their resolute materiality – their distinctive hardness and their uniform impenetrable surfaces. These properties are analysed from literary-historical, historical and philosophical perspectives, i.e. in the contexts of modernist hardness and its precursors; industrial production and the individual; and the causes and consequences, in thought, of the experience of bare materiality that the poems present. ududFinally it considers how the poems, as well as registering a particular mode of object experience, themselves seek to produce it.
机译:本论文是乔治·奥本(George Oppen)的《离散丛书》(Discrete Series)(1934)中第一篇整本书的文章,与奥本著作的批判读物形成了平衡,该读本迄今一直侧重于他返回诗歌之后(即从1962年开始)发表的作品。这是对作品的一种哲学表现,认为诗歌本身就是对象的哲学表现,并通过这些对象和表现形式表达了这些对象和诗歌本身的历史情况。 ud ud其方法是从三个方面来说是阿多尼斯式的:首先,它认为文学不仅是哲学(子)子集的主题,而且是其中的一种潜在参与方式。其次,论文与之对话的哲学著作既不是单一作者也不是严格的审美观,而是康德,黑格尔,马克思和尼采的众多著作(特别是黑格尔的著作)。第三,对阿多诺自己关于艺术和客观性的著作进行了不断的求助。 ud ud在简要介绍了客观主义的史前史,奥本与埃兹拉·庞德的联系以及作品的生产和外观,诗歌之后与Pound和TS等机构进行了更深入的制度验证的作品进行了深入分析艾略特这些阅读的主要重点是所代表的物理对象:它们的性质,类型,一致性以及表示的事实和方式。这些物体的特点是坚硬的材料–独特的硬度和均匀的不可穿透的表面。这些特性是从文学历史,历史和哲学的角度进行分析的,即在现代主义及其前身的背景下进行的分析;工业生产和个人;从思想上讲,这首诗所表现出的纯粹物质体验的原因和后果。最后,它考虑了诗歌以及如何以一种特定的对象体验形式进行记录,以寻求产生这种体验的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号