首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle
【2h】

Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle

机译:风险,预防措施和科学:进行更具建设性的政策辩论。谈预防原则

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Few issues in contemporary risk policy are as momentous or contentious as the precautionary principle. Since it first emerged in German environmental policy, it has been championed by environmentalists and consumer protection groups, and resisted by the industries they oppose (Raffensperger & Tickner, 1999). Various versions of the principle now proliferate across different national and international jurisdictions and policy areas (Fisher, 2002). From a guiding theme in European Commission (EC) environmental policy, it has become a general principle of EC law (CEC, 2000; Vos & Wendler, 2006). Its influence has extended from the regulation of environmental, technological and health risks to the wider governance of science, innovation and trade (O'Riordan & Cameron, 1994).
机译:在当代风险政策中,很少有问题像预防原则那样具有重大意义或争议性。自从它在德国的环境政策中首次出现以来,一直受到环保主义者和消费者保护组织的拥护,并遭到他们反对的行业的抵制(Raffensperger&Tickner,1999)。现在,该原则的各种版本遍布不同的国家和国际管辖区和政策领域(Fisher,2002年)。从欧洲委员会(EC)环境政策的指导性主题开始,它已成为EC法律的一般原则(CEC,2000; Vos&Wendler,2006)。它的影响已从环境,技术和健康风险的监管扩展到科学,创新和贸易的更广泛治理(O'Riordan&Cameron,1994)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stirling Andrew;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号