首页> 外文OA文献 >On Solving the Momentum Equations of Dynamic Sea Ice Models with Implicit Solvers and the Elastic-Viscous-Plastic Technique
【2h】

On Solving the Momentum Equations of Dynamic Sea Ice Models with Implicit Solvers and the Elastic-Viscous-Plastic Technique

机译:用隐式求解器和弹粘塑性技术求解动态海冰模型的动量方程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The momentum equations that describe sea ice drift for a viscous-plastic (VP) ice rheology are difficult to solve numerically, because the associated bulk and shear viscosities can be very large. Traditionally, implicit solution techniques for the VP rheology are thought to be expensive; the explicit elastic-viscous-plastic (EVP) method was designed to be more efficient and accurate. In order to assess their relative performance, experiments with idealized geometry are used to compare model solutions of implicit VP- and explicit EVP-solvers in two very different ice-ocean codes: the regular-grid, finite-volume Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm) and the Alfred Wegener Institute Finite Element Ocean Model (FEOM). For both codes the obtained solutions of implicit VP- and EVP-solvers can differ significantly, because the EVP solutions tend to have smaller ice viscosities (``weaker'' ice). EVP solutions tend to converge to implicit VP solutions for very small sub-cycling time steps. A limiting scheme for EVP viscosities, that addresses a noise problem, reduces the viscosity even further and, especially in the case of the variable-resolution unstructured grids of FEOM, can lead to unexpected ice distributions that are dramatically different from solutions without this scheme. Implicit VP-solvers are found to be generally faster than the EVP-solvers, most likely because the ice distribution does not change much within the short time steps of this study. Short time steps are thought to be typical of present day high resolution ice-ocean models, so that previous timing results for long time steps may no longer be representative.
机译:描述粘性冰(VP)流变学中海冰漂移的动量方程很难用数值求解,因为相关的体积粘度和剪切粘度可能非常大。传统上,用于VP流变的隐式求解技术被认为是昂贵的。显式弹性粘塑性(EVP)方法设计得更加有效和准确。为了评估它们的相对性能,使用理想化几何体的实验来比较两种非常不同的冰洋代码中的隐式VP和显式EVP求解器的模型解:规则网格,有限体积麻省理工学院普通循环模型(MITgcm)和阿尔弗雷德·韦格纳研究所有限元海洋模型(FEOM)。对于这两个代码,获得的隐式VP和EVP求解器的解决方案可能会有很大差异,因为EVP解决方案的冰粘度往往较小(``较弱''的冰)。 EVP解决方案倾向于在很小的子循环时间步长上收敛到隐式VP解决方案。用于解决噪声问题的EVP粘度的限制方案甚至进一步降低了粘度,尤其是在FEOM的可变分辨率非结构化网格的情况下,可能导致意想不到的冰分布,这与没有该方案的解决方案有很大不同。发现隐式VP解算器通常比EVP解算器快,这很可能是因为在此研究的短时间内,冰的分布变化不大。短时间步长被认为是当今高分辨率海洋模型的典型特征,因此长时间步长的先前计时结果可能不再具有代表性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Losch Martin; Danilov Sergey;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号