首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in blood pressure according to body position (supine, Fowler’s and sitting) in hypertensive subjects
【2h】

Differences in blood pressure according to body position (supine, Fowler’s and sitting) in hypertensive subjects

机译:根据高血压受试者的身体位置(仰卧,福勒和坐位)的血压差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Although blood pressure (BP) differences from supine to sitting position have long been recognized, limited data are available on other commonly used body positions. We performed a cross-sectional study to compare BP values obtained in supine, sitting, and Fowler's positions in essential hypertensive subjects.MethodsSystolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were recorded using an automatic oscillometric device. Nine measurements were taken three measurements, in random order, in supine, Fowler's, and sitting position. Two generalized estimating equations models were used to evaluate potential predictors of SBP and DBP adjusting for heart rate and measurement order.ResultsThe sample consisted of 250 subjects (mean age 66.3 13.4 years; 44.4% males). Measured in supine, Fowler's, and sitting position, mean SBPs were 139.3±14.0; 138.1±13.8; 137.2±13.7mmHg, respectively, and mean DBPs 80.1 9.1; 81.9±9.4; 83.0±9.6mmHg, respectively. At multivariate analysis, mean SBP significantly decreased if measured in Fowler's and sitting positions, as compared to supine. In contrast, DBP significantly increased. A relevant proportion of subjects showed large differences ( or 10mmHg) in mean SBP across positions i.e., 30.0% comparing supine vs. sitting SBP. An even higher prevalence of large differences was observed according to the measurement order within the same positions, with no univocal direction (random variation).ConclusionsFowler's position may represent a valid alternative to sitting and supine positions for BP measurement in clinical practice. BP random variability was found to be large regardless of body position, reinforcing the need for operators to closely follow current guidelines that recommend 2 recordings at each measurement
机译:背景技术尽管人们早就认识到了仰卧位与坐位位之间的血压差异,但有关其他常用体位的数据有限。我们进行了一项横断面研究,以比较基本高血压受试者在仰卧位,坐位和Fowler位置获得的BP值。方法使用自动示波法记录收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。九次测量是在仰卧,福勒和坐姿中以随机顺序进行的三项测量。使用两个广义估计方程模型来评估SBP和DBP对心率和测量顺序进行调整的潜在预测因素。结果该样本由250名受试者组成(平均年龄66.3 13.4岁;男性44.4%)。在仰卧位,福勒氏位和坐姿中测得的平均SBP为139.3±14.0; 138.1±13.8;分别为137.2±13.7mmHg和DBP 80.1 9.1; 81.9±9.4;分别为83.0±9.6mmHg。在多变量分析中,与仰卧相比,如果以福勒和坐姿测量,平均SBP显着降低。相反,DBP显着增加。相当比例的受试者在各个位置的平均SBP差异很大(或10mmHg),即与仰卧位和坐位SBP相比有30.0%的差异。在相同的位置上,根据测量顺序观察到的较大差异患病率甚至更高,没有明确的方向(随机变化)。结论在临床实践中,Fowler的位置可能是坐位和仰卧位的有效替代选择。不论身体位置如何,BP随机变异性都很大,这增加了操作员需要严格遵循当前的指南的建议,每次测量建议推荐2个记录

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号