首页> 外文OA文献 >Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis
【2h】

Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis

机译:俄罗斯的天然气比赛还是油腻的冲突?能源安全和2014年乌克兰危机

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This essay explores the link between energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Whenever there is an international conflict involving a major oil or gas producer, commentators are often quick to assume a direct link, and the Ukraine crisis was no exception. Yet, the various avenues through which energy politics have affected the Ukraine crisis, and vice versa, are not well understood. This paper seeks to shed light on the issue by addressing two specific questions. First, how exactly did energy contribute to the crisis in the region? Second, can energy be wielded as a ‘weapon’ by Russia, the EU, or the US? We find that Russian gas pricing played a crucial role as a context factor in igniting the Ukrainian crisis, yet at the same time we guard against ‘energy reductionism’, that is, the fallacy of attributing all events to energy-related issues. We also note that there are strict limits to the so-called energy weapon, whoever employs it. In the conclusion we provide a discussion of the policy implications of these findings.
机译:本文探讨了能源安全与2014年乌克兰危机之间的联系。每当发生涉及主要石油或天然气生产商的国际冲突时,评论员往往很快就会采取直接的联系,乌克兰危机也不例外。然而,人们对能源政治通过各种途径影响乌克兰危机(反之亦然)的途径还没有很好的了解。本文试图通过解决两个具体问题来阐明这一问题。首先,能源究竟如何助长了该地区的危机?其次,俄罗斯,欧盟或美国是否可以将能源用作“武器”?我们发现,俄罗斯的天然气价格在引发乌克兰危机方面起着至关重要的作用,但与此同时,我们提防“节能减排”,即将所有事件归因于能源相关问题的谬论。我们还注意到,无论使用哪种武器,所谓的能源武器都有严格的限制。在结论中,我们讨论了这些发现的政策含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号