首页> 外文OA文献 >Spatial proximity and distance travelled: commuting versus non-commuting trips in Flanders
【2h】

Spatial proximity and distance travelled: commuting versus non-commuting trips in Flanders

机译:空间接近度和行驶距离:法兰德斯的通勤与非通勤行程

摘要

This paper examines the relationship between daily travel distance and spatial characteristics in Flanders (and partly also in Brussels), in the north of Belgium. Important regional variations in commuting trip lengths are noticed, which are related to the spatial-economic structure including aspects of population density and spatial proximity. Commuter data obtained from the General Socio-Economic Survey 2001 are area covering and offer a lot of information. It is obvious that residents in the economic core areas produce less commuter mobility than people living in remote areas that have still access to the Brussels-Antwerp region. Proximity between home and work locations is paramount, when proximity is defined at a large geographical scale.Next, the spatial distribution of commuting distances, based on residential location, is compared to overall daily travel patterns including non-work travel. Since the second kind of data is only available in the form of a rather small sample, a multivariate regression equation based on spatial characteristics has been developed in order to extrapolate sample data throughout the Flanders region.When assessing overall daily travel patterns, including non-work travel, variables based on the spatial distribution of jobs do not show significant effects on the travel distance. However, spatial proximity is again paramount, although proximity should now be defined at a much smaller geographical scale. When considering all daily travel, the distance between the residence and an even small urban centre is much more decisive than the distance to the economic core areas (which is mainly consisting of the Brussels-Antwerp region).This finding qualifies the limited importance of the commute: today, it is mainly non-professional travel that is growing. Furthermore, the results suggest that residential density and land use mix in urban areas is the best guarantee for curbing excessive forms of overall (but especially: non-commuter) mobility.
机译:本文研究了比利时北部的法兰德斯(以及部分在布鲁塞尔)的每日旅行距离与空间特征之间的关系。人们注意到通勤旅行时长的重要区域差异,这与空间经济结构(包括人口密度和空间接近度)有关。从2001年一般社会经济调查中获得的通勤数据是涵盖区域,并提供了很多信息。显然,与生活在仍然可以访问布鲁塞尔-安特卫普地区的偏远地区的人们相比,经济核心地区的居民通勤出行更少。当在较大的地理范围内定义接近度时,居家位置和工作位置之间的接近度至关重要。接下来,将基于居住位置的通勤距离的空间分布与包括非工作旅行在内的总体每日出行方式进行比较。由于第二种数据仅以较小的样本形式提供,因此已开发出基于空间特征的多元回归方程,以便推断整个法兰德斯地区的样本数据。在工作旅行中,基于工作空间分布的变量对旅行距离没有显着影响。然而,尽管现在应该在一个较小的地理范围内定义邻近度,但是空间邻近度仍然是最重要的。考虑到所有日常出行,居住区和一个甚至很小的城市中心之间的距离比到经济核心区(主要由布鲁塞尔-安特卫普地区组成)之间的距离具有决定性的作用。通勤:如今,主要是非专业旅行在增长。此外,结果表明,城市地区的住宅密度和土地使用混合是遏制总体(特别是非通勤者)过度流动的最佳保证。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boussauw Kobe; Witlox Frank;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号