首页> 外文OA文献 >Canon's Entry Strategy to the Russian Market : the applicability of the “Foreign Markets Model” to entry strategies of the Russian market
【2h】

Canon's Entry Strategy to the Russian Market : the applicability of the “Foreign Markets Model” to entry strategies of the Russian market

机译:佳能进入俄罗斯市场的战略:“国外市场模型”对俄罗斯市场进入战略的适用性

摘要

With the transition to a market economy, Russia became a significant market for Japanese manufacturers in the 1990s. In the same period, Japanese companies began to enter the Russian market themselves. There is, however, little existing research into entry strategies used by those companies for their entry procedure. In this paper I have selected Canon as a case study and investigated the unique features of the marketing environment in Russia as well as the impact these features have had on entry strategies used in the region. The purpose of the paper is to assess whether entry strategies, theory and practice developed in Western free-market economies is being used to help guide the Russian market, to analyze how Japanese companies have responded to those markets and the kind of entry strategies they have adopted thus far.In 1997 Canon set up the Moscow office of its Finnish corporation ‘CANON NORTH-EAST OY’ and began exporting directly to Russia. Canon's entry mode to establish its subsidiary outside Russia cannot be explained under existing theories. Why, when it began to export directly, without using Japanese trading companies, did it establish its subsidiary in Finland and not in Russia? Takeda's Entry Model argues that a company begins by exporting, then establishes a sales subsidiary in the actual market, ultimately establishing its own production subsidiary. However, Canon chose to establish its sales subsidiary in Finland primarily because it was too great a risk for them to use the target country. The company claimed that they could not predict how corporate tax would change because the legal system in Russia was so unstable. Subsidiaries have to abide by local law. It was therefore, risky for Canon to undertake operations in Russia. In addition, the key merit of establishing subsidiaries is that a company will be able to realize the “completion of sales”. However, in Russia, if a Canon subsidiary based in Moscow imported directly to Russia and did not use local distributors, it would not be able to compete with those Canon products imported by independent local distributors. Consequently Canon chose Finland. The established market entry modes are applicable in Russia, but must be modified in relation to the specific features of the Russian market. If the foreign market is not ruled by law, as in Russia, a company may decide to establish a sales subsidiary offshore.
机译:随着向市场经济的过渡,俄罗斯在1990年代成为日本制造商的重要市场。在同一时期,日本公司开始自己进入俄罗斯市场。但是,关于这些公司用于进入程序的进入策略的现有研究很少。在本文中,我选择佳能作为案例研究,并研究了俄罗斯营销环境的独特特征以及这些特征对该地区采用的进入策略产生的影响。本文的目的是评估是否使用西方自由市场经济体开发的进入策略,理论和实践来帮助指导俄罗斯市场,分析日本公司如何回应这些市场以及他们拥有的进入策略的种类。佳能于1997年在芬兰的“ CANON NORTH-EAST OY”公司设立了莫斯科办事处,并开始直接向俄罗斯出口。佳能在俄罗斯境外设立子公司的进入模式无法用现有的理论来解释。为什么在不使用日本贸易公司的情况下开始直接出口时,却在芬兰而不是在俄罗斯建立了子公司?武田公司的进入模型认为,公司首先要进行出口,然后在实际市场中建立销售子公司,最终建立自己的生产子公司。但是,佳能之所以选择在芬兰设立销售子公司,主要是因为佳能对使用目标国家/地区构成太大的风险。该公司声称他们无法预测公司税将如何变化,因为俄罗斯的法律体系非常不稳定。子公司必须遵守当地法律。因此,佳能在俄罗斯开展业务存在风险。此外,建立子公司的主要优点是公司将能够实现“销售完成”。但是,在俄罗斯,如果位于莫斯科的佳能子公司直接进口到俄罗斯并且不使用本地分销商,则它将无法与独立的本地分销商进口的佳能产品竞争。因此,佳能选择了芬兰。既定的市场进入模式适用于俄罗斯,但必须针对俄罗斯市场的特定特征进行修改。如果国外市场不受俄罗斯的法律管辖,则公司可以决定在海外建立销售子公司。

著录项

  • 作者

    富山 栄子; Tomiyama Eiko;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 jpn
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号