首页> 外文OA文献 >'An evening of pleasure rather than business': songs, subversion, and radical sub-culture in the 1790s
【2h】

'An evening of pleasure rather than business': songs, subversion, and radical sub-culture in the 1790s

机译:“娱乐而非商务之夜”:1790年代的歌曲,颠覆和激进的亚文化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Politics and music are not usually two subjects discussed together. They are, in fact,udgenerally considered topics that are mutually exclusive: the one – politics – beingudthe clichéd bane of dinner-table conversation; the other, a common accompanimentudto many convivial occasions. This exclusiveness has been followed, to a largeudextent, into the academy by historians. Much scholarly attention has been dedicatedudto the history of politics as well as to music during the period covered by thisudarticle. However, thisudflourishing has taken place largely within, rather than across, the two strains of theuddiscipline. This lack of historical attention to the overlap betweenudpolitics and music underestimates the value of this interface as a key for unlockingudthe ways in which political and musical culture were entwined. Indeed, the twoudcultures have long been closely linked. Music has been widely used by governmentsudas part of the dominant discourse of the state, a tool of hegemonic controludand propaganda. John Street has shown how music was deployed byudthe Soviet Union in the 1930s, the Nazi regime during the Second World War, andudmore recently by the British political parties during the 2001 election campaign asudmeans of political leverage. These are just a few examples of the role played byudmusic as “a necessary adjunct of contemporary political communication”. Governments have utilised the popular culture appeal of music to helpudconstruct their rhetorical power and to influence the people: “From Plato to theudFrankfurt School and beyond, the case has been made for regarding music (especiallyudpopular music) as a source of power.”
机译:政治和音乐通常不是一起讨论的两个主题。实际上,它们在预算上被认为是相互排斥的主题:一个是“政治”,它是“在餐桌旁谈话的陈词滥调”。另一种是在许多欢乐场合的共同伴奏。历史学家将这种排他性引入了很大的依附性。在本文所涵盖的时期内,政治史以及音乐一直受到学术界的广泛关注。但是,这种“蓬勃发展”主要发生在两个“学科”内部,而不是交叉。历史上对政治与音乐之间的重叠缺乏关注,这低估了该界面作为破解政治与音乐文化交织方式的钥匙的价值。确实,这两种文化长期以来有着密切的联系。音乐已被政府国家占主导地位的话语部分广泛使用,这是霸权控制 udand宣传的工具。约翰·街(John Street)展示了1930年代的苏联,第二次世界大战期间的纳粹政权以及最近在2001年大选期间英国政党如何利用音乐作为政治影响力的手段。这些只是 udmusic作为“当代政治传播的必要辅助”所扮演的角色的几个例子。各国政府已利用音乐的流行文化魅力来帮助 u建构其修辞能力并影响人民:“从柏拉图到 ud法兰克福学校以及其他地区,已经有人提出将音乐(尤其是 udpopular音乐)作为来源的理由权力。”

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis MT;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号