首页> 外文OA文献 >Mealtime assistance for older adults in hospital settings and rehabilitation units from the perspective of patients, families and healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review
【2h】

Mealtime assistance for older adults in hospital settings and rehabilitation units from the perspective of patients, families and healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review

机译:从患者,家庭和医疗保健专业人员的角度为医院环境和康复机构中的老年人提供就餐援助:混合方法系统回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The prevalence of malnutrition for older adults (>65 years) in hospital and rehabilitation units has been reported as being as high as 60%; some older patients with good appetites do not receive sufficient nourishment because of inadequate feeding assistance. Mealtime assistance can therefore enhance nutritional intake, clinical outcomes and patient experience.udududObjectives: This mixed methods review sought to develop an aggregated synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data on assistance at mealtimes for older adults in hospital settings and rehabilitation units to determine current practices, what practices work, and the perceptions of patients, families, and healthcare professionals of mealtime assistance.ududInclusion criteria:ududTypes of participants: Participants included older adults (65 years and over) in hospital settings, including rehabilitation units.ududTypes of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest: The review focused on interventions for mealtime assistance, observed mealtime assistance, or discussed experiences of mealtime assistance with patients, families and healthcare professionals.ududTypes of studies: The review included qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.ududOutcomes: The outcomes of interest were the effectiveness of mealtime assistance initiatives and experiences of assistance at mealtimes.ududSearch strategy: The search strategy identified studies from seven databases published between 1998 and 2015.ududMethodological quality: Methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using standardized Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal instruments.ududData extraction: Standardized Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tools were used.ududData synthesis: Synthesis of the findings was reached through discussion. The results of quantitative studies could not be statistically pooled because of heterogeneity and are presented in narrative form. The results are presented as three aggregated mixed methods syntheses.ududResults: A total of 21 publications (19 studies) were included: 11 quantitative, five qualitative and three mixed method studies. Two studies were conducted in rehabilitation units, and 17 in hospital wards. Eight qualitative studies (nine papers) considered extrinsic and intrinsic factors that influence mealtime support. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions was limited to eight studies (nine papers); the remaining quantitative studies included two cross-sectional studies, three descriptive evaluations (four papers) and one observational/case study. The following are the aggregated mixed methods syntheses:udud* Mealtimes should be viewed as high priority, healthcare staff should limit other activities during mealtimes and allow older patients to eat uninterrupted, providing support where required.udud* Nursing staff, employed mealtime assistants, volunteers or relatives/visitors can help prepare the older patient for meals; this includes opening packages and cutting up food as well as physically feeding patients.udud* Social interaction at mealtimes for older patients is effective in increasing food, energy and protein intake, and should be encouraged.udud* Communication between all members of the multi-disciplinary team, staff and volunteers is essential.ududConclusion: No firm conclusions can be drawn with respect to the most effective initiatives. Initiatives with merit include those that encourage social interaction, either through the use of a dining room, or employed staff or volunteers, relatives or visitors supporting the older patient during mealtimes. Volunteers value training and support and clarification of their roles and responsibilities.
机译:背景:据报道,医院和康复机构中老年人(> 65岁)营养不良的患病率高达60%。一些食欲不振的老年患者由于喂养协助不足而无法获得足够的营养。因此,进餐时间协助可以提高营养摄入量,临床结果和患者体验。 ud ud ud目标:这项混合方法综述旨在针对医院环境和康复机构中老年人在进餐时间提供的定量和定性数据进行综合汇总。确定当前的做法,什么做法有效,以及患者,家庭和医疗保健专业人员对进餐时间协助的看法。 ud ud纳入标准: ud ud参与者类型:参与者包括医院环境中的老年人(65岁及以上), ud ud感兴趣的干预措施/现象类型:审查重点是就餐时间的干预措施,观察到的就餐时间的干预措施,或与患者,家庭和医护人员讨论就餐时间的经验。 ud ud研究:审查包括定性,定量和混合方法研究。 ud ud结果:结果 ud ud搜寻策略:这项搜寻策略从1998年至2015年间发布的七个资料库中找出研究。 ud ud方法学质量:研究方法学质量由两名评论者使用标准化的Joanna Briggs Institute关键评估工具。 ud ud数据提取:使用标准化的Joanna Briggs Institute数据提取工具。 ud ud数据综合:通过讨论得出结论的综合。由于异质性,无法对统计研究的结果进行统计汇总,并以叙述形式呈现。结果以三种汇总的混合方法合成形式呈现。 ud ud结果:总共包括21篇出版物(19项研究):11篇定量,五种定性和三篇混合方法研究。在康复科进行了两项研究,在医院病房进行了17项研究。八项定性研究(九篇论文)考虑了影响进餐时间支持的外在和内在因素。干预措施有效性的证据仅限于八项研究(九篇论文)。其余的定量研究包括两项横断面研究,三项描述性评估(四篇论文)和一项观察/案例研究。以下是综合的综合方法: ud ud *进餐时间应被视为高度优先事项,医护人员应在进餐时间限制其他活动,并允许老年患者不间断进餐,并在需要时提供支持。 ud ud * ,受雇的进餐时间助手,志愿者或亲戚/探视者可以帮助为年长的患者准备饭菜; ud ud *老年患者进餐时的社交互动可以有效地增加食物,能量和蛋白质的摄入,因此应予以鼓励。 ud ud *多学科团队的所有成员,工作人员和志愿者都是必不可少的。 ud ud结论:就最有效的倡议尚无确切的结论。值得一提的倡议包括鼓励通过用餐室或受雇的工作人员或志愿者,亲戚或来访者在用餐期间支持老年患者的社交互动。志愿者重视培训,支持和明确其角色和职责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号